Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for adminship/JPG-GR: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:38, 12 October 2008 editMathbot (talk | contribs)Bots472,606 edits Posting the edit count for JPG-GR  Revision as of 20:21, 13 October 2008 edit undoBalloonman (talk | contribs)25,417 edits →Caspian Blue's !vote: new sectionNext edit →
Line 249: Line 249:


* The edit count was retrieved from at 04:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC). * The edit count was retrieved from at 04:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC).

== Caspian Blue's !vote ==

#'''<s>Weak</s> Oppose''' <s>(a little leaning toward neutral)<s> I thought the candidate is already an admin because closing heated ] discussion is mostly taken care by admins. --] (]) 16:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
#:Sorry I'm a bit confused, you're opposing because the user already does work typically done by ] to such a standard that you did not realise they were not an admin? ] (]) 17:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
#::It also appears that this editor would support after October 19th ;-) <small>This makes no sense now that "week" misspelling has been fixed.</small> ] &#124; ] 17:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
#:::Oh, please, just let me express my point of view freely.--] (]) 04:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#::::You have that right, yes, but I still don't get, well, exactly why you're opposing. Could you elaborate? ] 04:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#:::::Why should I elaborate my already well-explained reason to ''you'' again? You might already cast your vote? I don't get any clear explanation from much of supporter's rationales such as "definitely", "of course", "why not" or no reason given for their stance. I'm opposing the candidate to be an admin because he has been acting like an admin to the sensitive issue. Need more?--] (]) 04:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#::::::Well, yeah, kinda. You mean you are opposing based on the appearance of presumptuousness? Because I'm pretty sure that JPG never said "I am an admin" at WP:RM. ] (]) 05:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#:::::::Guys, I initially opposed the candidate with the clear (for me) reason (and also look at the my lingering reservation for changing my vote to neutral). I've seen this unhelpful badgering by supporters too many which has never occurred to supporter's side. That just makes me sick, so I'm more opposing the candidate for these supporters' bagdering.--] (]) 05:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#::::::::Well, that's your prerogative, but I don't think it was clear to anyone who asked you. And frankly, I hardly think this is badgering. You opposed for some reason. People pressed for an explanation. Badgering would be steadfastly refusing to accept a given explanation (or something similar). No one seems to have done that here. ] (]) 06:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#: (unindent) So you're opposing ''more'' because you think others are badgering you? What does that have to do with evaluating the candidate? ]] 17:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#::Why do you think that ] has been getting more supporters after the news released that ] is his running mate? :) Unattractive badgering by supporters could produce counter-effects. --] (]) 17:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#:::Caspian blue has a for RfAs. This oppose (and lack of sound rationale) should not be surprising. Let's all move on. ] &#124; ] 18:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#::::Please be ] and don't resort to ]. Oh, That tool should be immediately fixed not to show such incorrect data of anyone's RFA activities. I know you're a RFA regular in "supporter" side per (although it would be incorrect as well) with cliches like "No reason not to trust" "per nom" or "absolutely". Just accept the fact that everybody can't be convinced like you.--] (]) 18:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
#:::::Caspian, not to point out a logical flaw with your attack on Tan... but at 80.6% support rate, it means that about 47% of the people who have 20 or more !votes in RfA's support more often than Tan. At 17%, there is only one person who opposes with more regularity than you... and that person has been indef blocked!---''']''' '']'' 20:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:21, 13 October 2008

Edit count for JPG-GR

User:JPG-GR
   run at Sun Oct 12 04:38:27 2008 GMT
   Category talk:         58
   Category:              129
   Image talk:            10
   Image:                 1114
   Mainspace              19028
   Portal talk:           6
   Portal:                6
   Talk:                  8919
   Template talk:         2113
   Template:              3563
   User talk:             1800
   User:                  301
   Misplaced Pages talk:        302
   Misplaced Pages:             3476
   avg edits per page     1.65
   earliest               04:55, 9 August 2006
   number of unique pages 24755
   total                  40825
   2006/8  165
   2006/9  289
   2006/10 391
   2006/11 185
   2006/12 201
   2007/1  465
   2007/2  656
   2007/3  1162
   2007/4  2251
   2007/5  3253
   2007/6  647
   2007/7  2347
   2007/8  2454
   2007/9  3477
   2007/10 3814
   2007/11 1803
   2007/12 1026
   2008/1  764
   2008/2  1895
   2008/3  3964
   2008/4  1236
   2008/5  1931
   2008/6  1528
   2008/7  1739
   2008/8  1545
   2008/9  1349
   2008/10 288
   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)
                                   Mainspace
   174 List of radio stations in Michigan by market area
   115 List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers monsters (Season One)
   107 Fox Kids
   87  List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers monsters (Season Two)
   81  List of radio stations in Michigan
   71  WXYT-FM
   67  WDVD
   64  Sora Takenouchi
   60  Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie
   53
       List of AM radio stations in the United States by call sign (initia
       l letter W)
   48  List of radio stations in Michigan by city
   44  List of radio stations in Michigan by call letters
   39  WKQI
   38  WYCD
   37  Anna Popplewell
                            Talk:
   41 Power Rangers: Mystic Force
   21 List of radio stations in Michigan by market area
   21 List of radio stations in Rhode Island
   12 On the Jewish Question
   11 Rail transport in the People's Republic of China
   10 Barenaked Ladies
   9  Diamond Dallas Page
   8  WWJ (AM)
   8  Power Rangers
   7  Apple IIGS
   7  Princess Louise Caroline of Hesse-Cassel
   7  Charlotte Amalie of Hesse-Cassel
   7  WKFR-FM
   6  Landgrave Frederick of Hesse-Cassel
   6  Budapest Gambit
            Category talk:
   2 Polish resistance fighters
   2 American Ska saxophonists
   2 People shot dead by police
   2 Scouting in the Netherlands
                       Category:
   3 New Hampshire radio station stubs
   2 Regent Communications radio stations
   2 Family Radio stations
   2 Wikipedians in the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD
   2 Radio stations in Lansing, Michigan
   2 Adult contemporary radio stations
   2 Radio stations in Arizona
   2 Requested moves
   2 Radio stations in the San Francisco Bay Area
   2 Radio stations in Georgia (U.S. state)
   2 WikiProject Radio Stations/Templates
   2 Alabama radio station stubs
   2 Arizona radio station stubs
   2 Guam radio station stubs
   2 Wikipedians who like the Power Rangers
          Image:
   5 AFR.jpg
   5 WKNW-AM.jpg
   5 Smilefmlogo.jpg
   4 WAY-FM.jpg
   4 WTIQ-AM.jpg
   4 WLEW-AM.jpg
   4 WLEW-FM.jpg
   3 VCY America.jpg
   3 WIDG-AM.jpg
   3 Wgfnlogo.jpg
   3 WFYC-AM.jpg
   3 WBCH-FM.jpg
   3 WMPX-AM.jpg
   3 WGER-FM.jpg
   3 WLXT-FM.jpg
                   Portal:
   2 Professional wrestling/Did you know
   2 Star Trek
                                Portal talk:
   2
     Military of the United States/U.S. Uniformed Service Officer Rank B
     adges
                 Template:
   62 Traverse City-Petoskey Radio
   57 Detroit Radio
   55 RadioTranslators
   38 Lansing-East Lansing Radio
   37 Grand Rapids Radio
   36 Marquette Radio
   35 Saginaw-Bay City-Midland Radio
   34 Muskegon Radio
   31 Kalamazoo Radio
   29 Battle Creek Radio
   29 Flint Radio
   29 Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan Radio
   22 Ann Arbor Radio
   19 CBS Radio
   16 Michigan Radio Markets
            Template talk:
   25 Infobox Radio station
   11 RadioTranslators
   7  Familytree
   6  Detroit Radio
   6  User contrib
   4  Michigan Radio Markets
   4  Power Rangers
   4  Lansing-East Lansing Radio
   3  Grand Rapids Radio
   3  Grand Forks AM
   3  Flint Radio
   3  Fargo FM
   3  AFV lover
   3  Muskegon Radio
   3  Ann Arbor Radio
                                 User:
   93 JPG-GR/Userboxes
   28 JPG-GR/RadioProject
   21 JPG-GR/Sandbox
   12 JPG-GR/Template:RadioDab
   7  JPG-GR/monobook.css
   7  JPG-GR/Sandbox2
   5  Phoenix741/GreenRanger
   4  DHowell/List of radio stations in California by market area
   3  DHowell/List of radio stations in San Francisco
   3  The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Weather fan
   3  DHowell/List of radio stations in Los Angeles
   3  UBX/Chicken Fingers
   3  DHowell/List of radio stations in California
   3  Knepflerle/RMinc
   3  JPG-GR/monobook.js
          User talk:
   773 JPG-GR
   38  Neutralhomer
   38  Rtphokie
   32  JPG-GR/Archive 5
   25  Ryulong
   18  JPG-GR/Archive 6
   16  JPG-GR/Archive 4
   15  JPG-GR/Archive 2
   14  JPG-GR/Archive 7
   10  JPG-GR/Archive 3
   9   Milonica
   8   Dravecky
   8   69.122.155.216
   7   71.187.44.107
   7   Betacommand
                          Misplaced Pages:
   2254 Requested moves
   68   WikiProject Radio Stations
   63   Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
   33   WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Repeated letters/5
   28   Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 22
   26   Administrators' noticeboard
   24   WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Capitalisation/7
   24   Userboxes/Computing
   15   Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 30
   15   Administrator intervention against vandalism
   14   Templates for deletion/Log/2007 December 23
   14   WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Punctuation/14
   14   Requests for page protection
   9    WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Capitalisation/5
   9    Village pump (technical)
                  Misplaced Pages talk:
   198 WikiProject Radio Stations
   36  Requested moves
   8   List of Wikipedians by number of edits
   5   WikiProject Martial arts
   5   WikiProject Tokusatsu
   3   Village pump
   3   WikiProject Deletion sorting
   3   WikiProject Elements
   3   WikiProject Television Stations
   2   WikiProject Radio
   2   WikiProject Radio Stations/Archive4
   2   Copyrights/Can I use...
   2   WikiProject Images and Media
   2   Accessibility
   2   WikiProject Michigan
   If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at
   User talk:Interiot.
  • The edit count was retrieved from this link at 04:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC).

Caspian Blue's !vote

  1. Weak Oppose (a little leaning toward neutral) I thought the candidate is already an admin because closing heated WP:RM discussion is mostly taken care by admins. --Caspian blue (talk) 16:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
    Sorry I'm a bit confused, you're opposing because the user already does work typically done by admins to such a standard that you did not realise they were not an admin? Guest9999 (talk) 17:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
    It also appears that this editor would support after October 19th ;-) This makes no sense now that "week" misspelling has been fixed. Tan | 39 17:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
    Oh, please, just let me express my point of view freely.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    You have that right, yes, but I still don't get, well, exactly why you're opposing. Could you elaborate? Wizardman 04:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Why should I elaborate my already well-explained reason to you again? You might already cast your vote? I don't get any clear explanation from much of supporter's rationales such as "definitely", "of course", "why not" or no reason given for their stance. I'm opposing the candidate to be an admin because he has been acting like an admin to the sensitive issue. Need more?--Caspian blue (talk) 04:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Well, yeah, kinda. You mean you are opposing based on the appearance of presumptuousness? Because I'm pretty sure that JPG never said "I am an admin" at WP:RM. Protonk (talk) 05:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Guys, I initially opposed the candidate with the clear (for me) reason (and also look at the my lingering reservation for changing my vote to neutral). I've seen this unhelpful badgering by supporters too many which has never occurred to supporter's side. That just makes me sick, so I'm more opposing the candidate for these supporters' bagdering.--Caspian blue (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Well, that's your prerogative, but I don't think it was clear to anyone who asked you. And frankly, I hardly think this is badgering. You opposed for some reason. People pressed for an explanation. Badgering would be steadfastly refusing to accept a given explanation (or something similar). No one seems to have done that here. Protonk (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    (unindent) So you're opposing more because you think others are badgering you? What does that have to do with evaluating the candidate? DiverseMentality 17:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Why do you think that John McCaine has been getting more supporters after the news released that Sarah Palin is his running mate? :) Unattractive badgering by supporters could produce counter-effects. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Caspian blue has a 17% support rate for RfAs. This oppose (and lack of sound rationale) should not be surprising. Let's all move on. Tan | 39 18:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Please be WP:CIVIL and don't resort to Ostracism. Oh, That tool should be immediately fixed not to show such incorrect data of anyone's RFA activities. I know you're a RFA regular in "supporter" side per 80.6% (although it would be incorrect as well) with cliches like "No reason not to trust" "per nom" or "absolutely". Just accept the fact that everybody can't be convinced like you.--Caspian blue (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    Caspian, not to point out a logical flaw with your attack on Tan... but at 80.6% support rate, it means that about 47% of the people who have 20 or more !votes in RfA's support more often than Tan. At 17%, there is only one person who opposes with more regularity than you... and that person has been indef blocked!---Balloonman 20:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)