| Revision as of 06:34, 20 February 2004 edit24.105.197.133 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:17, 21 February 2004 edit undo24.105.197.133 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Current East Slavic languages: ], ], ] and others. | Current East Slavic languages: ], ], ] and others. | ||
| Ukrainian and Belarusian are considered by some to be dialects of Russian rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of polital vs |
Ukrainian and Belarusian are considered by some to be dialects of Russian rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of polital vs purely liguistic criterion in the designation of individual languages. The languages are somewhat similar enough to provide a continuum of partial mutual intelligibility over part of the area of these languages. | ||
| All these languages use ] ] with minor modifications. | All these languages use ] ] with minor modifications. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| --History-- | --History-- | ||
| The classic |
The classic genetic schema of the three Eastern Slavic languages is that they each developed separately from a common East Slavic root language. An alternative, more-nuanced view is to posit a predecesor of the modern Ukrainian and Belarusian languages in the language of Old Ruthenian. According to this theory the language to the north, Russian, developed almost exclusively from Old Slavonic, while Ukrainian and Belarusian devloped from a common ancestor, Old Ruthenian. The old Ruthenian language then diverges into Belarusian and Ukrainian in the 16-17th centuries. | ||
Revision as of 03:17, 21 February 2004
Subgroup of Slavic languages, currently spoken in Eastern Europe.
Current East Slavic languages: Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian and others.
Ukrainian and Belarusian are considered by some to be dialects of Russian rather than separate languages in their own right. This raises the question of polital vs purely liguistic criterion in the designation of individual languages. The languages are somewhat similar enough to provide a continuum of partial mutual intelligibility over part of the area of these languages.
All these languages use Cyrillic alphabet with minor modifications.
--History--
The classic genetic schema of the three Eastern Slavic languages is that they each developed separately from a common East Slavic root language. An alternative, more-nuanced view is to posit a predecesor of the modern Ukrainian and Belarusian languages in the language of Old Ruthenian. According to this theory the language to the north, Russian, developed almost exclusively from Old Slavonic, while Ukrainian and Belarusian devloped from a common ancestor, Old Ruthenian. The old Ruthenian language then diverges into Belarusian and Ukrainian in the 16-17th centuries.