| Revision as of 17:27, 29 September 2005 edit71.112.11.220 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:55, 3 October 2005 edit undoFriday (talk | contribs)19,776 edits POV fork?Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| - names for the different factions. afrocentrists is a much different characterization than just that believing egyptians were black (I'm somewhat in the latter, but wouldn't call myself an afrocentrist). the "other" camp doesn't have a name at this point. | - names for the different factions. afrocentrists is a much different characterization than just that believing egyptians were black (I'm somewhat in the latter, but wouldn't call myself an afrocentrist). the "other" camp doesn't have a name at this point. | ||
| == POV fork? == | |||
| Is this article a POV fork of ]? ] ] 19:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:55, 3 October 2005
It's all yours -- have at it
Things that would be nice to see
- more organization. I gave subject headers a shot, but the paragraphs were intertwined somewhat, making it difficult
- timeline indicating when artifacts were created illustrating black-or-not-blackness in relevance to various egyptian historical events (pyramids built)
- any evidence that egyptians were NOT black. this came from the afrocentrism page so it provides mostly evidence egyptians were black.
- discussion of importance--why are people arguing about this?
- discussion of difficulty in ascertaining race
- names for the different factions. afrocentrists is a much different characterization than just that believing egyptians were black (I'm somewhat in the latter, but wouldn't call myself an afrocentrist). the "other" camp doesn't have a name at this point.
POV fork?
Is this article a POV fork of Afrocentrism? Friday (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC)