| Revision as of 03:36, 1 October 2005 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 editsm →See also: + Epistemic virtue← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:42, 4 October 2005 edit undo202.156.6.61 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' nothing in this topic.When someone is you say is good, that means they are your role models! <math>Insert formula here</math> | |||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result. | |||
| == Headline text == | |||
| Scientists and scholars generally consider ] a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ], and the unsupported amplification of a relationship. | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
| * ''Some examples:'' ], ], ] | * ''Some examples:'' ], ], ] | ||
| * ''Compare'': ], ], ], ] | * ''Compare'': ], ], ], ] | ||
| --] 08:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 4 October 2005
Intellectual dishonesty nothing in this topic.When someone is you say is good, that means they are your role models! == Headline text ==link title
== Headline text ==See also
- In specific fields: Scientific misconduct, Journalism scandals
- Some examples: Honesty, Ethics, Epistemic virtue
- Compare: Scientific skepticism, Scientism, rigour, Epistemic virtue
--202.156.6.61 08:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |