| Revision as of 00:33, 1 February 2004 editAngela (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users45,368 edits see also← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:51, 1 February 2004 edit undo211.28.114.120 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| See ] for a past discussion on whether this article should have been deleted. | See ] for a past discussion on whether this article should have been deleted. | ||
| ---- | |||
| All the anti-Cubic arguments in the "Time Cube" article are actually wrong and can be easily refuted. However, rather than correct the article myself, I will simply invite any free thinkers who are interested in learning the Truth to debate Time Cube on the . No closed-minded Academian pedants, please. | |||
Revision as of 03:51, 1 February 2004
See Talk:Time Cube/Delete for a past discussion on whether this article should have been deleted.
All the anti-Cubic arguments in the "Time Cube" article are actually wrong and can be easily refuted. However, rather than correct the article myself, I will simply invite any free thinkers who are interested in learning the Truth to debate Time Cube on the Time Cube forum. No closed-minded Academian pedants, please.