| Revision as of 16:56, 31 October 2008 editHolly Cheng (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators116,583 edits →Image:TFMWNCB age 4.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:03, 31 October 2008 edit undoHolly Cheng (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators116,583 edits →Image:TFMWNCB age 4.jpgNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ===October 31=== | ===October 31=== | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this section. '' <!--Template:Pui top--> | |||
| ] | |||
| Speedy closing this as a ] nomination. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 17:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| The Fat Man claims that he releases this into the public domain as the copyright holder. I call shenanigans. How could he have snapped this photo of himself at age 4? He needs to provide proof to OTRS that the photographer released this into the public domain. I'm sorry, but if this turns out to be a false claim of copyright ownership, this will severely hurt his chances of being elected to ArbCom. ] (]) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | The Fat Man claims that he releases this into the public domain as the copyright holder. I call shenanigans. How could he have snapped this photo of himself at age 4? He needs to provide proof to OTRS that the photographer released this into the public domain. I'm sorry, but if this turns out to be a false claim of copyright ownership, this will severely hurt his chances of being elected to ArbCom. ] (]) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Oh come on, it comes from his parent. Although technically you might be correct, this is nitpicking to the highest degree. One can assume that TFMWNCB can get a written transfer of copyright from his own parents without actually requiring the proof. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 16:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | :Oh come on, it comes from his parent. Although technically you might be correct, this is nitpicking to the highest degree. One can assume that TFMWNCB can get a written transfer of copyright from his own parents without actually requiring the proof. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 16:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Pui bottom--></div> | |||
| ==== ] + ] ==== | ==== ] + ] ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 31 October 2008
| < October 30 | November 1 > |
|---|
October 31
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Speedy closing this as a WP:POINT nomination. howcheng {chat} 17:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:TFMWNCB age 4.jpg
The Fat Man claims that he releases this into the public domain as the copyright holder. I call shenanigans. How could he have snapped this photo of himself at age 4? He needs to provide proof to OTRS that the photographer released this into the public domain. I'm sorry, but if this turns out to be a false claim of copyright ownership, this will severely hurt his chances of being elected to ArbCom. Mike R (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh come on, it comes from his parent. Although technically you might be correct, this is nitpicking to the highest degree. One can assume that TFMWNCB can get a written transfer of copyright from his own parents without actually requiring the proof. howcheng {chat} 16:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Image:CARBON LEAF2.jpg + Image:FISHER BLUE MERLE1.jpg
Uploaded by ScottFisher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a sock of Scottfisher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has been banned for multiple copyvio issues. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 07:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Kaiser wilhelm der grosse portrait.jpg
"Source" does not give any information about the source or copyright status of the image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:KWDG SINKING.jpg
No indication of date of publication to confirm public domain-ness. The date indicated in the description is the date that the event depicted occurred. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Kwdg03.jpg
No indication of date of image to give an idea of public domain-ness. The date indicated on the description is the date the event depicted occurred, and not necessarily the date of publication of this image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:SS Lurline.jpg
No indication from stated source that this is actually a Coast Guard photo. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:CharlotteDayTripping.jpg
The image has a watermark in the bottom right corner...the watermark "Markus L. Blackwell Jr." is inconsistent with the name "Dragan Blazevic". From looking at the user's talk page and contributions, it appears that he has uploaded many non-free images as "public domain"...for instance, the user claimed that the UNC Charlotte logo is public domain, and many images looked like they had been taken off the Web (although I could certainly be wrong). It seems to be more of a matter of him being unclear on what public domain is and the rules for uploading images on Misplaced Pages rather than him being malicious. — Scootey (talk) 02:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC).
Image:Chrissmithhaynes.jpg
No indication why this government site would have public domain images. At the same time, orphaned and now UE. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Ely.jpg
No reason why this image would be in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Wheelbarrel.jpg
No indication why this image would be in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Stout.gif
File history shows this icon is likely a derivative of a copyrighted image that has been photoshopped to conceal its source. Therefore improper licensing as a free image. MBisanz 15:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Hot sauce small.png
Non-free derivative of a copyrighted image showing a product and its logo. MBisanz 15:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Oil_on_sea_otter.jpg
Considering that this photo is watermarked with a copyright statement, I would suggest that it's not actually PD-USGov. howcheng {chat} 16:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Category: