Revision as of 01:49, 8 February 2004 editJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators143,602 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:04, 8 February 2004 edit undoJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators143,602 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Among the main demands were civil rights of the Croatian citizens. Among these rights there was the right to take pride in one's ] which irritated ]'s ] government which had made every attempt to suppress and erase all such notions ever since ], fearing loss of stability and eventual breakup of the country due to ethnic tensions. The banning of national symbols was intended to suppress all fascist ideological symbols such as the ] or ] markings, but it also extended to banning most patriotic songs and customs. | Among the main demands were civil rights of the Croatian citizens. Among these rights there was the right to take pride in one's ] which irritated ]'s ] government which had made every attempt to suppress and erase all such notions ever since ], fearing loss of stability and eventual breakup of the country due to ethnic tensions. The banning of national symbols was intended to suppress all fascist ideological symbols such as the ] or ] markings, but it also extended to banning most patriotic songs and customs. | ||
Some in the movement also voiced demands for an independent ] of Croatia which would allow the republic to keep profits made from tourism within Croatia. However, as nobody mentioned waiving the republic's right to use the common Yugoslav fund for the underdeveloped regions, this idea was pretty much worthless. | Some in the movement also voiced demands for an independent ] of Croatia which would allow the republic to keep profits made from tourism within Croatia. However, as nobody mentioned waiving the republic's right to use the common Yugoslav fund for the underdeveloped regions, this idea was pretty much worthless. Concerns were also raised about the monopoly of the Yugoslav Investment Bank and the Bank for Foreign Trade from ] on all foreign investments and trade. | ||
There were also attempts to bring the notion of including ] into ] to the attention of the authorities but this was far from anything that the movement leaders were proposing. | There were also attempts to bring the notion of including ] into ] to the attention of the authorities but this was far from anything that the movement leaders were proposing. | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The movement organized demonstrations in ] and thousands of ] students publically protested. | The movement organized demonstrations in ] and thousands of ] students publically protested. | ||
The Yugoslav leadership interpreted the whole affair as a restoration of Croatian ], dismissed the movement as ] and had the police suppress the demonstrators. Many student activists were detained and some were even sentenced to years of prison. | The Yugoslav leadership interpreted the whole affair as a restoration of Croatian ], dismissed the movement as ] and had the police suppress the demonstrators. Many student activists were detained in December 1971 and some were even sentenced to years of prison. Some estimate that up to two thousand people were criminally prosecuted for participation in these events. | ||
The leadership of the ], Vladimir Bakarić, Milka Planinc and others were keen on punishing the dissidents and they did indeed expel and imprison several members of the Communist student organizations and members of the Communist Party itself, mostly including university professors and the like (in January 1972). However, some of the high-ranked members of the Communist Party from Croatia such as Savka Dabčević-Kučar and Mika Tripalo also supported these ideas so the government couldn't sweep it all under the rug. | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | In ], a new federal Constitution was ratified that gave more autonomy to the individual republics, thereby basically fulfilling the main goals of the 1971 movement. One of the provisions of the new constitution was that each republic officially had the option to secede, an option which most of them utilized twenty years later. | ||
Several student leaders from the Croatian spring later turned out to be influential political figures. Ivan Zvonimir-Čičak became the leader of the Croatian ]. Dražen Budiša became the leader of the ]. | Several student leaders from the Croatian spring later turned out to be influential political figures. Ivan Zvonimir-Čičak became the leader of the Croatian ]. Dražen Budiša became the leader of the ]. |
Revision as of 02:04, 8 February 2004
The Croatian spring (Hrvatsko proljeće) was a political movement from the early 1970s that called for greater rights for Croatia which was then part of Yugoslavia.
The things were set in motion when a group of influential Croatian poets and linguists published a Declaration on the Name and Position of the Croatian Literary Language in 1967. After 1968, the patriotic goals of that document morphed into a generic Croatian movement for more rights for Croatia, and it was beginning to receive grass roots support and many student organizations actively started to voice their support for the cause.
Among the main demands were civil rights of the Croatian citizens. Among these rights there was the right to take pride in one's nationality which irritated Tito's communist government which had made every attempt to suppress and erase all such notions ever since World War II, fearing loss of stability and eventual breakup of the country due to ethnic tensions. The banning of national symbols was intended to suppress all fascist ideological symbols such as the Ustaša or Četnik markings, but it also extended to banning most patriotic songs and customs.
Some in the movement also voiced demands for an independent National Bank of Croatia which would allow the republic to keep profits made from tourism within Croatia. However, as nobody mentioned waiving the republic's right to use the common Yugoslav fund for the underdeveloped regions, this idea was pretty much worthless. Concerns were also raised about the monopoly of the Yugoslav Investment Bank and the Bank for Foreign Trade from Belgrade on all foreign investments and trade.
There were also attempts to bring the notion of including Herzegovina into Croatia to the attention of the authorities but this was far from anything that the movement leaders were proposing.
The movement organized demonstrations in 1971 and thousands of Zagreb students publically protested.
The Yugoslav leadership interpreted the whole affair as a restoration of Croatian nationalism, dismissed the movement as chauvinist and had the police suppress the demonstrators. Many student activists were detained in December 1971 and some were even sentenced to years of prison. Some estimate that up to two thousand people were criminally prosecuted for participation in these events.
The leadership of the Croatian Communist Party, Vladimir Bakarić, Milka Planinc and others were keen on punishing the dissidents and they did indeed expel and imprison several members of the Communist student organizations and members of the Communist Party itself, mostly including university professors and the like (in January 1972). However, some of the high-ranked members of the Communist Party from Croatia such as Savka Dabčević-Kučar and Mika Tripalo also supported these ideas so the government couldn't sweep it all under the rug.
In 1974, a new federal Constitution was ratified that gave more autonomy to the individual republics, thereby basically fulfilling the main goals of the 1971 movement. One of the provisions of the new constitution was that each republic officially had the option to secede, an option which most of them utilized twenty years later.
Several student leaders from the Croatian spring later turned out to be influential political figures. Ivan Zvonimir-Čičak became the leader of the Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights. Dražen Budiša became the leader of the Croatian Social Liberal Party.