| Revision as of 15:04, 20 December 2007 edit67.164.248.90 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:48, 8 November 2008 edit undo86.15.137.91 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''''Dostoevsky and Parricide''''' is a 1928 article by ] that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern ]: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexuality tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the Oedipus complex. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that ]'s works are diminished by their weak Christian endings. | '''''Dostoevsky and Parricide''''' is a 1928 article by ] that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern ]: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexuality tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the ]. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that ]'s works are diminished by their weak Christian endings. | ||
| (Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in ] (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. (Freud drew extensively on ]'s ].) | (Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in ] (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. (Freud drew extensively on ]'s ].) | ||
Revision as of 19:48, 8 November 2008
Dostoevsky and Parricide is a 1928 article by Sigmund Freud that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern parricide: Oedipus the King, Hamlet, and The Brothers Karamazov. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexuality tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the Oedipus complex. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that Dostoevsky's works are diminished by their weak Christian endings.
(Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in Totem and Taboo (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. (Freud drew extensively on Frazer's The Golden Bough.)
Categories: