| Revision as of 19:42, 1 February 2002 view sourceEd Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,237 edits to Joao: help!← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:51, 25 February 2002 view source Damian Yerrick (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,087 editsm I leveraged your jokeNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Joao, I'm sorry I ignored your plan for the article. I thought it would be better to make it entirely scientific, and put the political aspects in ] -- which still needs much work. I need your help with that, as well as with ]. Please give me your suggestions, and I will to try to cooperate on our common goal of improving the wikipedia. -- Ed | Joao, I'm sorry I ignored your plan for the article. I thought it would be better to make it entirely scientific, and put the political aspects in ] -- which still needs much work. I need your help with that, as well as with ]. Please give me your suggestions, and I will to try to cooperate on our common goal of improving the wikipedia. -- Ed | ||
| I leveraged ]. --] | |||
Revision as of 15:51, 25 February 2002
Ed Poor, the sources of the Global warming article were classified in Political and Scientific because Political sources were used for the political part of the article and Scientific sources were used for the scientific part of the article. I have told you this before, but you are ignoring this. I'm going to stop editing that article. Joao
Joao, I'm sorry I ignored your plan for the article. I thought it would be better to make it entirely scientific, and put the political aspects in global warming controversy -- which still needs much work. I need your help with that, as well as with global warming. Please give me your suggestions, and I will to try to cooperate on our common goal of improving the wikipedia. -- Ed
I leveraged your joke. --Damian Yerrick