Revision as of 21:01, 17 September 2008 editAl Ameer son (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators74,647 edits upgrade← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:33, 14 November 2008 edit undoBotPuppet (talk | contribs)5,110 editsm BOT: substituting template per WP:SUBST, Replaced: {unsigned → {subst:unsignedNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
(this is said not only for this event but also in general) | (this is said not only for this event but also in general) | ||
hypocracy/Antisemitism?<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
hypocracy/Antisemitism?{{unsigned|82.81.16.213}} | |||
:Well aren't you racist toward arabs then? Their "propaganda machine" which probably doesn't really exist.] 15:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | :Well aren't you racist toward arabs then? Their "propaganda machine" which probably doesn't really exist.] 15:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:33, 14 November 2008
Palestine Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling
Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. Puddleman 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- While describing the November 8th event (massacre, incident, shelling). It should be noticed that we can not confirm if it was a intentional act of the IDF. Thus we must describe the event in a passiv way. "The house was shelled by the IDF." Rather then "The IDF shelled the house". This is just a minor PC expression, which I think will make the description more neutral and not judge, whether or not the event was a misfire (as stated by the IDF). 81.5.2.197 13:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
don't belive to the arabs propoganda machine
they know very well how to pose in front of a camera and making themselves "suffering" but,to host terrorists,who know they are "operating" from "civilian" concentrations,knowing that the Israeli Army is the most humane Army in the world,and other armies (like Russian,French,British,and American) don't care about how the "world will respond". so the terrorists keep firing bombs intentionally towards Israeli towns (like Sderot) but Israel,of course,cannot retaliate even with the smallest force,because if they do,it will be a "massecre" right?
I wonder,if Mexico would have done the same thing to America even once,not in the course of 6 years,what the united states would have done...
lets face it,if other Army "accidently" bombs a mosque,or a wedding,no one cares... but if israel will do a 1% of that,the whole world will awake suddenley (this is said not only for this event but also in general)
hypocracy/Antisemitism?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.81.16.213 (talk • contribs)
- Well aren't you racist toward arabs then? Their "propaganda machine" which probably doesn't really exist.69.143.254.116 15:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Watch it: Palestinian national radio puts out the call, a bunch of women in Burkhas show up at a mosque to smuggle out the terrorists hiding there, get shot at, and the terrorists bitch about the IDF firing on "civilian women" and there's no propaganda machine? . NotAWeasel 14:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
This is a town
I think we need more information about this city (apart from the recent massacre) such as history, demographics, transportation, objects that can be found here, notable persons that come from this town(if any), etc. . Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 13:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Amoruso 12:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
On that note, I moved the timeline of the events there to Operation Autumn Clouds. Cheers, Tewfik 07:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Categories: