Misplaced Pages

Talk:Zoot: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:21, 17 November 2008 editSesshomaru (talk | contribs)Rollbackers40,876 edits →Layout: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 03:34, 17 November 2008 edit undoPdfpdf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,076 edits →Layout: Still refusing to discuss the issue, eh? It must be good to always be right!Next edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


::::What more is there to say? The dab is fine. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC) ::::What more is there to say? The dab is fine. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

:::::a) There is plenty to say. b) The dab is '''''not''''' "fine". Why would I go to the effort of changing it if it was "fine"? ] (]) 03:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:34, 17 November 2008

WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

There is no primary usage here because the page is titled "Zoot", not "Zoot (disambiguation)" or "Zoot suit (disambiguation)". For more information, see WP:PRIMARYMEANING and MOS:DAB#Linking to a primary topic. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

This page covers "Zoot" and "Zoot suit" the second of which has a clear primary meaning at Zoot suit. And don't be cheeky about reverting mate, I let this go so let's be friends or I will need to report your clear violation. Abtract (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Well you're obviously ignoring me as usual. If there's anyone "violating" anything it's you, not me. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I split the Zoot Suit dab back off (and enforced the arbitration agreement each way). -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Layout

This layout looks terrible! Why was this done? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

You need A Cup Of Tea, A Bex and A Good Lie Down. It was done because, to use your words, the current "layout looks terrible!".
Your statement is simply your POV.
I said "Discuss it on the talk page." I see no "discussion" - simply asserting the infallibility of your own opinion is not "discussion". Pdfpdf (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't need anything thank you very much. I'm just trying to do my job here, and that is keeping dab-related pages looking nice and neat (per the guidelines of course). Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
OK, I'll get arbitration. Clearly, you refuse to discuss the matter - you simply insist that you are right. With luck you'll listen to someone with authority. Pdfpdf (talk) 03:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
What more is there to say? The dab is fine. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
a) There is plenty to say. b) The dab is not "fine". Why would I go to the effort of changing it if it was "fine"? Pdfpdf (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Category: