Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:57, 29 November 2008

JIDF

updated JIDF ceedjee outed as a strongly biased anti-Israeli editor by the JIDF..........Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 12:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes Ceedjee, a comic touch makes one's day. Next Olmert will be on their list!Best wishes as always.Nishidani (talk) 12:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I am not after the admiration of the Jews. I don't need their love. I have to study and write, and I intend to ensure that my writings will live as well. With or without the blessing of Kahane and the other religious leaders from Jerusalem. I will destroy anyone who will raise a hand against wp:rs sources, I will destroy him and his pov, with or without our famous neutrality of point of view. I don't care if he is Christian, Muslim, Jewish or pagan. History teaches us that he who won't kill will be killed by others. That is an iron law.(*)

After this typical jewish humour where the subject makes fun of himself, I just want to underline that if JIDF wanted to intimidate me, they have succeeded. I am not in a position to risk anything for... nothing. Assuming people can be that far to the right of me on the political scale is frightening when one knows where I am myself...

Ceedjee (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

(*) "(...). I am not after the admiration of the gentiles. I don't need their love. (...). I have to live, and I intend to ensure that my children will live as well. With or without the blessing of the Pope and the other religious leaders from the New York Times. I will destroy anyone who will raise a hand against my children, I will destroy him and his children, with or without our famous purity of arms. I don't care if he is Christian, Muslim, Jewish or pagan. History teaches us that he who won't kill will be killed by others. That is an iron law" (Interview performed by Amos Oz in 1982).

November 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. Your posting of my name and email address on my talk page is outrageous. How dare you do such a thing! RolandR (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

May I know what's happening and where I would have vandalized anything ??? Ceedjee (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Agressivity against user:ceedjee (from RolandR's talk page)

You has just attacked me and threatened me on my talk page. May I know why ?
It seems clear you cannot control yourself ! Ceedjee (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

I understand. You don't want your email to be published. Mine is : ceedjee@hotmail.com. Everybody knows your name. What is the problem ? By the way, it is not working ! Ceedjee (talk) 17:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh... And this should not prevent you to apologize for all the personnal attacks you throwned at my face recently on Irgun's talk page ! Ceedjee (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

About my "assumed" bad faith : 5 days ago Ceedjee (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Notification of I-P ArbCom sanctions

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

• Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
• The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
• Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
• Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.

PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)