Misplaced Pages

User talk:SamuelSpade: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:01, 11 October 2005 editDavidpdx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,793 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 11:04, 14 October 2005 edit undoDavidpdx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,793 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


:In terms of this article being reverted, if it is it will be deemed vandalism and reported. ] 04:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC) :In terms of this article being reverted, if it is it will be deemed vandalism and reported. ] 04:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

= Response to message left on my talk page =

:::The truth is there is NO consensus. Because the two of you claim this trash is true, doesn't not make it so. It is absolutely ridiclous to claim consensus. I have posted on BOTH your your talk pages about consensus on Misplaced Pages and neither one of you seem to care about it. I will continue to revert the page back to the one that was last agreed upon and report all reverts by both you as vandalism. If you want a revert war, simply bring it on. It is not only myself that disagrees with what you are posting, there are others who have made comments on the DOM page regarding the lack of proof you base your article on. I will be posting this on both of your talk pages in order to make sure you see this message. ] 11:04, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:04, 14 October 2005

I changed my user name from Samspade to SamuelSpade as it was brought to my attention there was another user that already had SamSpade with Spade capitalized. This should clear my identiy in the future. Sorry for any confusion.SamuelSpade 18:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Bokak Atoll Consensus Issue

Please do not revert the Bokak Atoll article. There is no consensus, which is what is being worked on on the DOM page. Davidpdx 07:05, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

In terms of how consensus is defined on Misplaced Pages, that has not been reached. Also I have asked countless times to see the SBS clip and you have yet to produce it. The proof of a master sovereign lease over Taongi (aka Bokak Atoll) has not been shown. Misplaced Pages has certain rules regarding proof.
I urge you to check out the following links regarding policies on using sources on Misplaced Pages:
Misplaced Pages:Cite sources Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources Misplaced Pages:No original research Misplaced Pages:Verifiability
In terms of this article being reverted, if it is it will be deemed vandalism and reported. Davidpdx 04:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Response to message left on my talk page

The truth is there is NO consensus. Because the two of you claim this trash is true, doesn't not make it so. It is absolutely ridiclous to claim consensus. I have posted on BOTH your your talk pages about consensus on Misplaced Pages and neither one of you seem to care about it. I will continue to revert the page back to the one that was last agreed upon and report all reverts by both you as vandalism. If you want a revert war, simply bring it on. It is not only myself that disagrees with what you are posting, there are others who have made comments on the DOM page regarding the lack of proof you base your article on. I will be posting this on both of your talk pages in order to make sure you see this message. Davidpdx 11:04, 14 October 2005 (UTC)