Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Casliber: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:03, 1 December 2008 editKablammo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,431 edits →Article work: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 14:06, 1 December 2008 edit undoKablammo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,431 edits →Article workNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
== Article work == == Article work ==


It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us have the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. ] (]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. ] (]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:06, 1 December 2008

Template:Acecandheader

Edit Analysis

A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Misplaced Pages spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Article work

It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. Kablammo (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)