| Revision as of 23:43, 1 December 2008 editGoodDamon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,271 edits →User:Highfructosecornsyrup: This is... weird.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:54, 1 December 2008 edit undoShrampes (talk | contribs)111 edits →User:Highfructosecornsyrup: and so it goesNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *'''Note:''' Shrampes , Highfructosecornsyrup already . ''']''' (]) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Note:''' Shrampes , Highfructosecornsyrup already . ''']''' (]) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Whoa, hey, Cirt? Highfructosecornsyrup turned out to be a sock of Wikipediatrix, who was duly chastised for it and had the sock indef-blocked. She apparently liked arguing with herself. But I seriously doubt she'd do it again. --<font color="green">]</font>] 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Whoa, hey, Cirt? Highfructosecornsyrup turned out to be a sock of Wikipediatrix, who was duly chastised for it and had the sock indef-blocked. She apparently liked arguing with herself. But I seriously doubt she'd do it again. --<font color="green">]</font>] 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| I did edit in ] recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the ] description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. ] (]) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 23:54, 1 December 2008
User:Highfructosecornsyrup
- Suspected sock puppeteer
Highfructosecornsyrup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Suspected sock puppets
- Shrampes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
See also accounts from the checkuser case cited below:
- Wikipediatrix (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Terryeo (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and others.
- Report submission by
- Evidence
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup
- Highfructosecornsyrup was active on Scientology-related articles: Special:Contributions/Highfructosecornsyrup, as is Shrampes:
- Shrampes edits articles related to username of Highfructosecornsyrup:
- After being inactive for over a year , Shrampes appears makes a flurry of edits, and proceeds to comment in a Topic Ban Proposal discussion related to User:Shutterbug on Scientology-related articles and the ArbCom case Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/COFS. Cirt (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Note: Shrampes notified, Highfructosecornsyrup already blocked indef. Cirt (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Whoa, hey, Cirt? Highfructosecornsyrup turned out to be a sock of Wikipediatrix, who was duly chastised for it and had the sock indef-blocked. She apparently liked arguing with herself. But I seriously doubt she'd do it again. --GoodDamon 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I did edit in Dianetics recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the WP:SPA description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. Shrampes (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions