| Revision as of 14:06, 1 December 2008 editKablammo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,427 edits →Article work← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:43, 2 December 2008 edit undoCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,918 edits hehNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ''']''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. ] (]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ''']''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. ] (]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::''I understand'' Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Article work == | == Article work == | ||
| It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. ] (]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. ] (]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::''Thanks for the kudos, at least they are nice opposes'' :) Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:43, 2 December 2008
Edit Analysis
A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Misplaced Pages spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I understand Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Article work
It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us has the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. Kablammo (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kudos, at least they are nice opposes :) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)