| Revision as of 22:26, 3 December 2008 editOttava Rima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,327 edits →Very troubling← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:23, 3 December 2008 edit undoSceptre (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors79,170 edits →Very troublingNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| :Yep. Quack quack on off-wiki canvassing... ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 22:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | :Yep. Quack quack on off-wiki canvassing... ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 22:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I wasn't going to go that far, but now that you mentioned it... :) They are all seemingly connected around the same pages, and haven't been editing in a while. They also seem to edit during disputes. Hmmmmm. ] (]) 22:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | ::I wasn't going to go that far, but now that you mentioned it... :) They are all seemingly connected around the same pages, and haven't been editing in a while. They also seem to edit during disputes. Hmmmmm. ] (]) 22:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Azeri-Armenia. ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 23:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 3 December 2008
Edit Analysis
A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Misplaced Pages spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Personal statement from User:Jpgordon
I would be extremely happy if John were to be elected to ArbCom. I'm certain he could do a much better than job than I was able to; he's shown himself to be better suited to the task. Good luck, John. --jpgordon 02:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Josh. Much appreciated. John Vandenberg 02:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
AA involvement
I sadly note a number of Azerbaijan-Armenia related users have voted to oppose on the issue of my involvement in their topical area. This is an area I have recused, due to involvement in the editing and dispute resolution. I've posted an explanation here, and if there are questions not asked on my questions page, please do ask them. John Vandenberg 17:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Very troubling
Anyone else notice seven people attempting to oppose but are not eligible to vote? Ottava Rima (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep. Quack quack on off-wiki canvassing... Sceptre 22:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to go that far, but now that you mentioned it... :) They are all seemingly connected around the same pages, and haven't been editing in a while. They also seem to edit during disputes. Hmmmmm. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Azeri-Armenia. Sceptre 23:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to go that far, but now that you mentioned it... :) They are all seemingly connected around the same pages, and haven't been editing in a while. They also seem to edit during disputes. Hmmmmm. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)