| Revision as of 02:08, 5 December 2008 editFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,976 edits My reasons for nominating the article for an FAR | Revision as of 02:34, 5 December 2008 edit undoRegentsPark (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,689 edits →Kingdom of Mysore: notifications requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I have described the specifics in my post, ] on the article talk page. If you have more time to devote to this, you may also want to read the ], however, in order to avoid repetition, please ignore the links to the sources there. Needless to say, this is very much ''my'' version of events and reality. Regards, ]] 02:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | I have described the specifics in my post, ] on the article talk page. If you have more time to devote to this, you may also want to read the ], however, in order to avoid repetition, please ignore the links to the sources there. Needless to say, this is very much ''my'' version of events and reality. Regards, ]] 02:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *Please notify relevant wikiprojects and important contributers to this article (including, if possible, the original FA nominator) and post these notifications at the top of this FAR (see the instructions at the top of ]). Thanks you.--] <small>(])</small> 02:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:34, 5 December 2008
Kingdom of Mysore
This article was promoted on November 4, 2007. I am aware that a lot of hard work went into the article, however, I feel that the article has some issues of inaccuracy and bias. I'm not implying, even remotely, that the bias was intended, but it nonetheless needs to be remedied. In particular, I feel the article violates three feature article criteria. These criteria are:
- 1(b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
- 1(c) factually accurate: claims are verifiable against reliable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations.
- 1(d) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
I have described the specifics in my post, My concerns on the article talk page. If you have more time to devote to this, you may also want to read the background section, however, in order to avoid repetition, please ignore the links to the sources there. Needless to say, this is very much my version of events and reality. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Please notify relevant wikiprojects and important contributers to this article (including, if possible, the original FA nominator) and post these notifications at the top of this FAR (see the instructions at the top of WP:FAR). Thanks you.--Regents Park (bail out your boat) 02:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)