| Revision as of 19:29, 9 December 2008 editSummerPhD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers91,322 edits {{subst:adw|Derrick James}} ~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:40, 10 December 2008 edit undoSgeureka (talk | contribs)Administrators34,680 edits →Re: Garfield & Friends: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ==AfD nomination of Derrick James== | ==AfD nomination of Derrick James== | ||
| ]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 19:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 19:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Garfield & Friends == | |||
| Feel free to merge and redirect them, but you should hurry up before the deletion counter is up (in two days I think?). You can also all redirect them now and slowly work through the page histories at your own speed. It's unlikely that you'll need more than one (or two) sentence(s) from each article, so it may not be worth the effort since you could as well read plot summaries on another website to come up with a new sentence of plot summary each. I don't mind what you decide to do as long as the articles are gone in the end (i.e. merging, redirection and deletion are all fine to me). – ] <sup>]•]</sup> 09:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:40, 10 December 2008
Large Lakes Observatory
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Large Lakes Observatory, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.d.umn.edu/llo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Gary Curran
Hello Lorty. I see you removed the prod on this article based on the fact that "he plays in a semi-pro league". WP:ATHLETE states that he must play in a fully professional league. Please could you reinstate the prod. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 57 07:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ohio Grade Level Chess Championships
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ohio Grade Level Chess Championships, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- doubtful notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TerriersFan (talk) 20:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Derrick James
An article that you have been involved in editing, Derrick James, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Derrick James. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Garfield & Friends
Feel free to merge and redirect them, but you should hurry up before the deletion counter is up (in two days I think?). You can also all redirect them now and slowly work through the page histories at your own speed. It's unlikely that you'll need more than one (or two) sentence(s) from each article, so it may not be worth the effort since you could as well read plot summaries on another website to come up with a new sentence of plot summary each. I don't mind what you decide to do as long as the articles are gone in the end (i.e. merging, redirection and deletion are all fine to me). – sgeureka 09:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)