| Revision as of 16:58, 10 December 2008 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits →Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz: Response to Malik.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:52, 10 December 2008 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz: thank youNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :I've the text in question as requested. | :I've the text in question as requested. | ||
| :Regards, ] 16:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | :Regards, ] 16:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thank you. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 17:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:52, 10 December 2008
Counting votes in piotrus 2
Could you have another go in counting the votes, there are some errors, particularly since there 12 active thus 7 votes are needed to pass a proposal. For example FoF 18, 19, 20, (you forgot 21) is listed as passing, but with 2 abstentions 6 votes are required to pass these, not 5. Martintg (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I made my evaluation of the proposed decision based on a majority of 7. I was in fact the one who adjusted the majority immediately before writing my notes. Would you still like me to re-count? AGK 20:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz
Hello. At least six ArbCom members agree that there is no evidence that Boodles and I are related accounts, but you described me as Boodles' sock. Would you do me a favor and edit that? Thanks. — ] (] · ]) 00:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that; I misread the proposal in my haste to finish authoring my notes.
- I've adjusted the text in question as requested.
- Regards, AGK 16:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. — ] (] · ]) 17:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)