| Revision as of 17:52, 10 December 2008 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz: thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:37, 11 December 2008 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 16h) to User talk:AGK/Archive/45.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| |archive = User talk:AGK/Archive/45 | |archive = User talk:AGK/Archive/45 | ||
| }}{{User:AGK/Header|box=no|talk=yes|datetime=yes|icons=yes|backlog=no}} | }}{{User:AGK/Header|box=no|talk=yes|datetime=yes|icons=yes|backlog=no}} | ||
| == Counting votes in piotrus 2 == | |||
| Could you have another go in counting the votes, there are some errors, particularly since there 12 active thus 7 votes are needed to pass a proposal. For example FoF 18, 19, 20, (you forgot 21) is listed as passing, but with 2 abstentions 6 votes are required to pass these, not 5. ] (]) 19:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I made my evaluation of the proposed decision based on a majority of 7. I was in fact the one who adjusted the majority immediately before writing my notes. Would you still like me to re-count? ] 20:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz == | == Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz == | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 11 December 2008
Boodlesthecat's sock Malik Shabazz
Hello. At least six ArbCom members agree that there is no evidence that Boodles and I are related accounts, but you described me as Boodles' sock. Would you do me a favor and edit that? Thanks. — ] (] · ]) 00:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that; I misread the proposal in my haste to finish authoring my notes.
- I've adjusted the text in question as requested.
- Regards, AGK 16:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. — ] (] · ]) 17:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)