Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tweety21: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:57, 11 December 2008 edit198.96.80.15 (talk) This is bizarre and OBSESSED! THIS GUY NEEDS A JOB INSTEAD OF HARASSING PEOPLE ON THE NET! WILL CALL THE POLICE← Previous edit Revision as of 15:58, 11 December 2008 edit undo198.96.80.15 (talk) THESE PEOPLE ARE FUCKING INSANE AND OBSESSED!!Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===As always, please check for any sleeper accounts. ] ([[User poster I've never heard of? What the heck is going on here?

And most importantly, there isn't just one person in the whole wide world who complains about Ward3001. This is paranoia to the extreme. Stop harassing me and stop posting my ip address.--] (]) 02:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
:Then I suggest you don't edit using an IP address, and don't link it to yourself. I also suggest you stop returning to Misplaced Pages. Per the privacy policy, a CheckUser could have confirmed whether the IP was you or not. But they didn't, so you should be thankful. Also, I suggest you don't make legal threats, as we block editors who make them. For the record, both accounts reported to AIAV for blocking. <font face="Trebuchet MS">]<small> (]) (]) (])</small></font> 03:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
::And blocked by ]. <font face="Trebuchet MS">]<small> (]) (]) (])</small></font> 03:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


=== ] (6th request)===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=10:11, ], ] (])}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Fatres}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

user Tweety21 previously used a sock (]) to create the same article this user has. Beyond that, their editing style and promoting of ] and his band Dopo Yume are other constants. As usual, please check for sleeper accounts (see ] for list of IPs). ] (]) 10:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

*Fatres appears to be {{unrelated}} ] 11:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

=== ] (5th request)===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=2008-02-24}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Bradjamescop}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

Only edits are vandalising the talk page of one of user Tweety21's IPs, including altering Tweety21's name in the IPsock tag. Please check for sleepers (see ] for list of IPs). ] (]) 19:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

*{{confirmed}}, also {{user|Thegoodgirl01}} and {{user|Pocahantas}}. Blocked. ] 23:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


*{{confirmed}} as above. I'd also been checking and edit-conflicted with Thatcher above. Also {{IPblock}} - as it had been blocked previously and socking re-started when the 2-week block expired - ] <sup>]</sup> 23:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

=== ] (4th request)===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=02:07, 2 February 2008}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Cancergirl}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

Account used to blank page that details edit history of user Tweety21 (only edits). Please check for sleepers (see archived request for list of IPs). ] (]) 02:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

*The only other account is {{user|Stalkerbuster}}, already blocked. ] 02:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

=== ] ===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=19:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Halloween12}}
* {{checkuser|Englandbridge}}
* {{checkuser|Englandrules}}
* {{checkuser|Brooklynthegood}}
* {{checkuser|Angelheart25}}
* {{checkuser|Wikiwasteoftime}}
* {{checkuser|Jonathanwins}}
* {{checkuser|Newyorkjill|Newyorkjill}}
* {{checkuser|Texastuna}}
* {{checkuser|Jonastate}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

user Tweety21 continues to create accounts and edit from various IPs. Some of these accounts have been already been blocked but I am requesting verification that these are, in fact, her and also wonder if there are any as-yet undiscovered accounts that were created by the same user. Angelheart25 may have been set up while visiting someone at Christmas—account was created and all edits were on 26 Dec, nothing since (reverted an article to an months-older version by Tweety21, user page very similar to Tweety21's and her various socks). Some IPs known to have been used include the ranges 142.205.xxx.xxx and 65.95.xxx.xxx, also 198.96.80.15 (a library), 70.54.193.128, 216.191.208.99, 216.240.7.14, 74.110.247.117, 99.249.172.137; user most often edits out of ]. ] (]) 00:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

* Adding ]—Editing Tweety21-related sock tags and comments re:Tweety21). (User has now been blocked.) ] (]) 23:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
* Adding ]—Posts complaints in multiple forums re: a comment that JzG made about Tweety21). (This user has been blocked.) ] (]) 13:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
* Additional—one of Tweety21's old IPs (]) has been quite active this today, edits almost exclusively on own talk page, including removal of Tweety21 sock tag. Please give special attention to any accounts recently created from this IP, a 3-month block expired less than a week ago and the protection tag was removed from the page early today. ] (]) 01:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
* Adding ], ], and ]; all three blanked information from Tweety21's ban discussion immediately after the accounts were created. ] (]) 01:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

{{TakeNote}} I checked a few of these and confirmed they were Tweety21, you missed {{user|Peterchomers}}. There are no obvious additional accounts. No comment on the IPs but draw your own conclusions. ] 14:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

=== ] ===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=21:44:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Dopofan}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

Banned user Tweety21 frequently edited ] (and created—and re-created—an article for Galland's band Dopo Yume). A new user, Dopofan, has started editing the Galland article as well as ], another article which Tweety21 edited. ] (]) 21:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
:Ban discussion took place . --] (]) 21:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

{{Confirmed}}. ''']''' ('']'') 23:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

=== ] ===
{{rfcu box|case=Tweety21|filed=16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|Tweety21}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Wiccawikka}}
* {{checkuser|Buddahelps}}
* {{checkuser|Gayunicorn}}
* {{checkuser|David0007}}
* {{checkuser|Julia1970}}
* {{checkuser|Darcy monaco}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

Indefinitely blocked user Tweety21 (also blocked at various IPs) edited yesterday as ] and started up again today as Wiccawikka. See also ]. ] 16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
:Added new suspected sock (Buddahelps) and what the heck, even though it's got an indef block, can you please check Gayunicorn, just to be sure? ] 02:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
::I blocked Wiccawikka and Buddahelps as transparently obvious sockpuppets. I'd like to request disclosure of any other socks. --] 21:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
:::Added new socks David0007, Julia1970 and a new IP, all now blocked. ] 17:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
::::I didn't see anything. --] <small>]</small> 20:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
:::::I have redacted the IP addresses as the user has expressed a privacy concern. She has been unblocked following a (hopefully) productive conversation. ] 20:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::Fine by me. Case closed. Clerks should feel free to archive. --] <small>]</small> 22:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
(undent) Added one more suspect sock that came up in discussion today. Before this case is closed can there be some kind of confirmation as to whether or not these are all Tweety21's socks? I ask because while she has admitted to some of them, she has not admitted to them all, and a confirmation would really help clear that up. ] 23:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
:{{declined}}. This is bordering on a request to prove innocence, which we don't process. --] <small>]</small> 23:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
::Wait, what? This is absolutely a request to prove guilt. Tweety21 continually denied she was using socks, all the while using them to edit disruptively. When she finally "came clean", she still said "Sock puppet reveiw was never conclusive", refusing to fully admit guilt. Especially important is the Darcy monaco, since she directly denied that it was her, when admitting other wrongs. ] 23:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

] 17:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)thanks for all your help, as a closing remark, I would like to say that if by editing, I knew I was somehow exposing my location to anybody out on wikipedia, where I go to the library, where I work, I never would have bothered as this was just a hobby for me. Also I am sure by checking the ip of Darcy Monaco (someone I have never met, and I would never use someone else name!!) you realize it is coming from a different country than I reside in, would appreciate if you would take "abusive sock puppet" off her id if possible- I am too embarassed to send her an email about this (email meaning via wikipedia) yesh I think I am retiring from Wiki :O)] 17:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
:How do you know so much information about someone who has not only never mentioned any of it on Misplaced Pages, but has no e-mail set? I'm starting to wonder why you were unblocked. --] <small>]</small> 19:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

::{{user|Darcy monaco}} has deleted contribs to an article whose other significant contributor was Tweety21, and I pointed this out on her talk page. She denies being related. This conversation is ocurring on multiple levels. Perhaps we should converge somewhere. My view of this incident is that Tweety21 has edited a lot while logged out, giving the appearance (intentional or not I do not know) of sockpuppetry. When Precious Roy starting taking her articles to AfD and CSD, she overreacted and made a threat, for which she was blocked. While blocked, she used sockpuppets to complain about the block and to try and stop people from talking about her IP addresses, which she had not realized were publicly available and easily tied to her employer and geographic location. After withdrawing the threat and having the IP situation explained to her, I unblocked. With the possible exception of the Darcy monaco account, her other disruptive actions ocurred after the block and I think it is reasonable to accept that her actions were the result of not understanding Misplaced Pages arcana like deletion policy, the consequences of IP editing, that using Special:Contributions is not always stalking, and so on. Other explanations are also possible and if I am wrong and this turns out to be a disruptive user, she can be reblocked. As long as she is not currently running additional sockpuppets, I'm not sure there is anything to be gained by pursuing this further at this time. ] 22:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
*] 12:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC) As stated before, I do not know this girl, I googled her name (try it) and some info popped up, I told you if you wish I can fax in photo id...anything to clear up this sort of ridiculous accusation! I live in another country..I am not a US citizen!(can't you tell by my ip?) ] 12:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
::Clerks please archive. Nothing more to do here. --] <small>]</small> 12:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
<center>''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font></br>Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.</center></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Revision as of 15:58, 11 December 2008