Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:59, 17 December 2008

Anthroponymy Redirect‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy Redirect This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Zombie Disambiguation

Heh, remember that Simpsons episode where the zombies are going back into their graves, and one zombie interrupts another burying himself: "wait a minute, I'm John Smith!" "John Smith 1882?" "My mistake." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.208.51 (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned

• Very amusing. orizon 04:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Wait a minit, maybe i was wrong to leave this here rather than move it to the new talk:John Smith page: Was that zombie thing another variation on your basic Disambiguation joke???
    --Jerzy•t 06:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
    

Moved sections

The following sections formerly on this talk page are now part of talk:John Smith, since they seemed to be about abt the name itself -- i.e., the name as distinct from the real people and typical fictional characters who have borne it -- rather than about the task of Dab'g the name with respect to articles that could have been titled "John Smith" if there were only one of them:

• talk:John Smith#John Not-A-Vampire-At-All Smith
• talk:John Smith#Most famous John Smith needs to go up top

--Jerzy•t 06:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction

This page says that John Smith is the name used by hospitals for unnamed male patients. The other page says they use the name John Doe. Neither has a citation. --Thinboy00 @759, i.e. 17:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

There's no way that all hospitals consistently use either John Doe or John Smith. Quite likely, some use one and others use the other and others use another name altogether. All you have to do is change it to "some hospitals" and the contradiction disappears. That being said, without a citation it's all just guesswork or anecdotal. Good Ol’factory 10:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Dab or article

This old contrib is placed in a box to encourage attention to the fact that another copy of it exists at Talk:John Smith#Dab or article
--Jerzy•t 06:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

This page seems to be both an article about the name "John Smith" and a disambiguation page for various people named "John Smith". The two concepts should be split, since dabs aren't articles and have their own guidelines (like no categories or references needed). Which should go at the base name? Base name dab and John Smith (name), or base name article and John Smith (disambiguation)? -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the above, the narrative about the name at the top of the page should be floated off to form it's own article. I think the DAB page should keep the base name and the article be titled 'John Smith (name)'. Alchemagenta (talk) 11:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

• I have performed more or less such a division, a bit more detail follows the other copy of the preceding contribs.
  --Jerzy•t 06:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  

• Redirect-Class Anthroponymy pages
• NA-importance Anthroponymy pages