| Revision as of 13:21, 18 December 2008 view sourceXenovatis (talk | contribs)5,245 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:03, 18 December 2008 view source Xenovatis (talk | contribs)5,245 edits →Slavic scripts: removed sad. no longer need for thatNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :You have violated ] at ] and ]. I expect you to revert your changes immediately, or I will report you and ask to have you blocked. Yes, we should reach consensus, but meanwhile you should not be pushing a POV as fact. ] (]) 11:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | :You have violated ] at ] and ]. I expect you to revert your changes immediately, or I will report you and ask to have you blocked. Yes, we should reach consensus, but meanwhile you should not be pushing a POV as fact. ] (]) 11:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::You are clearly projecting, as well as abusing your admin priviledges. Again. |
::You are clearly projecting, as well as abusing your admin priviledges. Again. ] (]) 13:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 18 December 2008
 Archives |
Τσου
Κανένα μικροedit εδώ κι εκεί θα κάνω, όπως πάντα. Ο Γιώργος έχει RL issues οπότε δε θα τον ενοχλήσω προς το παρόν. Που θα πάει, θα επιστρέψει όμως! Καλως μάς γύρισες κι εσύ. Τα άρθρα σου για τη διασπορά είναι πολύ ενδιαφέροντα (phallkloric χα). 3rdAlcove (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Slavic scripts
Yes, you're keeping the reference, but deleting the referenced material. I'll be happy to discuss stuff you have a problem with on the talk page, but blanking pertinent material ref'd by reliable sources is not appropriate. And no, we do not use other encyclopedias as references. They are not considered reliable. (I can't go through a page in the EB without finding a factual error, but this is also Misplaced Pages policy.) kwami (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- You have violated WP:3RR at Glagolitic alphabet and Early Cyrillic alphabet. I expect you to revert your changes immediately, or I will report you and ask to have you blocked. Yes, we should reach consensus, but meanwhile you should not be pushing a POV as fact. kwami (talk) 11:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- You are clearly projecting, as well as abusing your admin priviledges. Again. Xenovatis (talk) 13:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)