Revision as of 21:39, 19 April 2005 edit213.84.212.97 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:52, 20 October 2005 edit undoJmac800 (talk | contribs)208 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all |
If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all African and therefore what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of Africans. ] 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC) | ||
The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --] 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) | The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --] 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:52, 20 October 2005
- As pagan culture faded, so did the chance of another African pope.
Huh? Pagan culture was somehow an antidote against racism, or Christianity was/is somehow inherintly racist, or both? -- Khym Chanur 04:09, Nov 1, 2003 (UTC)
If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all African and therefore what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of Africans. Maximus Rex 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)
The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --213.84.212.97 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)