| Revision as of 00:52, 20 October 2005 editJmac800 (talk | contribs)208 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:18, 20 October 2005 edit undoHajor (talk | contribs)20,379 editsm Reverted edits by Jmac800 to last version by 213.84.212.97Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all African and therefore what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of Africans. ] 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC) | If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all North African and therefore not what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of sub-Saharan Africans. ] 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC) | ||
| The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --] 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) | The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --] 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:18, 20 October 2005
- As pagan culture faded, so did the chance of another African pope.
Huh? Pagan culture was somehow an antidote against racism, or Christianity was/is somehow inherintly racist, or both? -- Khym Chanur 04:09, Nov 1, 2003 (UTC)
If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all North African and therefore not what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of sub-Saharan Africans. Maximus Rex 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)
The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --213.84.212.97 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)