| Revision as of 17:22, 20 October 2005 editIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits →Dispute← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:22, 20 October 2005 edit undoIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits →SourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| In case anyone cares... | In case anyone cares... | ||
| MacGregor recorded legend | *MacGregor recorded legend | ||
| State v Riogi FJHC 81 | *State v Riogi FJHC 81 | ||
| Copy of the documents purporting a lease on Solkope | *Copy of the documents purporting a lease on Solkope | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 20 October 2005
Dispute
Give me a bit of time to find the source for the Solkope land dispute. If anyone is truly concerned about the factuality of this claim I will pull the whole reference to DOM and just leave a location stub in the interim.--Isotope23 13:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- I can't find the website I found the dispute information on, so in the interest of fairness, I've removed that portion for the time being. Hopefully I'll have more time to find it later. I did tweak the wording because the legality of the lease documents and the ownership of the island by Hiagi Apao are purported by DoM, but have never been conclusively proven. The documents were used as evidence in a crimal case (State v Riogi FJHC 81), but no ruling was made on the legality of the documents (they were presented as evidence of seditious intent by the defendant and the legal claims of ownership were in no way considered in this case). I write this because I'm already seeing the potential for a POV edit war where anon IP's try to introduce POV text into this article. If this starts turning into an edit war I will request an edit lock on this article.--Isotope23 14:08, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Sources
In case anyone cares...