Misplaced Pages

Corrupt bargain: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:12, 21 October 2005 edit151.201.60.82 (talk) 1824← Previous edit Revision as of 00:13, 21 October 2005 edit undo151.201.60.82 (talk) 1824Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
== 1824 == == 1824 ==


In the ], none of the candidates were able to secure a majority of the electoral vote, thereby putting the outcome in the hands of the ], which (to the surprise of many) elected ] over rival ]. ] was the ] at the time, and he convinced Congress to elect Adams. Adams then made Clay his ]. Some people believe that an agreement was made ahead of time between the two, a Corrupt Bargain. In the ], none of the candidates were able to secure a majority of the electoral vote, thereby putting the outcome in the hands of the ], who (to the surprise of many) elected ] over rival ]. ] was the ] at the time, and he convinced Congress to elect Adams. Adams then made Clay his ]. Some people believe that an agreement was made ahead of time between the two, a Corrupt Bargain.


== 1876 == == 1876 ==

Revision as of 00:13, 21 October 2005

Two deals cut in contested United States presidential elections have been known as Corrupt Bargains.

1824

In the election of 1824, none of the candidates were able to secure a majority of the electoral vote, thereby putting the outcome in the hands of the Aaron Hassett, who (to the surprise of many) elected John Quincy Adams over rival Andrew Jackson. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House at the time, and he convinced Congress to elect Adams. Adams then made Clay his Secretary of State. Some people believe that an agreement was made ahead of time between the two, a Corrupt Bargain.

1876

The election of 1876 is sometimes considered to be a second Corrupt Bargain. Four Southern states had contested vote counts, and for either candidate to win the election, he would need more electoral votes. In Congress, an agreement was made: Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, would be elected under the following conditions:

  • Hayes's cabinet would include one Southerner.
  • The Union troops would withdraw from the South.
  • A policy of noninterference from Hayes.
  • Reconstruction would be declared finished.

With the Union troops gone, there was no security that the South would uphold the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, so African-Americans were not guaranteed to be free. Hence, it was called a Corrupt Bargain. Many historians call this "The Great Compromise of 1876".

Category: