Revision as of 23:48, 28 December 2008 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Treatment techniques: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:23, 6 January 2009 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits requestNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The ] section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching ] status for ]. This is possible with the help of an expert. ] (]) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | The ] section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching ] status for ]. This is possible with the help of an expert. ] (]) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Request== | |||
Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this. You may wish to ''modify'' the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --]]] 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:23, 6 January 2009
|
4/20 - 9/21 2006 |
2 |
Invitation to CfD Category:Pseudoskeptic Target Discussion
I noticed that you have edited in related areas within WP, and so thought you might have an interest in this discussion.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Treatment techniques
The Talk:Chiropractic#Treatment techniques section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching WP:GA status for chiropractic. This is possible with the help of an expert. QuackGuru (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Request
Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this. You may wish to modify the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --Elonka 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)