| Revision as of 00:54, 9 January 2009 editArthur Kemp (talk | contribs)73 edits →Sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:00, 9 January 2009 edit undoRocksanddirt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,954 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| Mr anonymous Rocksanddirt is a Nazi, and if he says he is not, we will apply his standards to him, and dismiss his opinion as worthless. How about that for twisted logic? | Mr anonymous Rocksanddirt is a Nazi, and if he says he is not, we will apply his standards to him, and dismiss his opinion as worthless. How about that for twisted logic? | ||
| :that sort of thing is not helpful. please remove it. | |||
| :after looking a bit more at splc, I'm inclined to remove the whole section as unverifiable. This is an encyclopedia, not a forum to either bash or promote anyone. I also put a note at the reliable sources noticeboard, hopefully some regular there has already investigated the reliability of the splc. --] (]) 01:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:00, 9 January 2009
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
The link I posted in "External Links" is by an amateur Portuguese historian with the same academic credentials in this field as Arthur Kemp.
It would appear that Mr Kemp is currently in the midst of an extensive rewrite of his own biographic article.. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
encyclopedic notability
Even as a published author, I'm not feel'n it. and may propose this for deletion in a couple of days. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Sources
The sources used mostly don't seem to be reliable sources. I removed a few things that were clearly not good sources, marked a few places that need sources.
Mr. Kemps blog and books are only good for his opinion and response to things, not as facts for the article. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Mr anonymous Rocksanddirt is a Nazi, and if he says he is not, we will apply his standards to him, and dismiss his opinion as worthless. How about that for twisted logic?
- that sort of thing is not helpful. please remove it.
- after looking a bit more at splc, I'm inclined to remove the whole section as unverifiable. This is an encyclopedia, not a forum to either bash or promote anyone. I also put a note at the reliable sources noticeboard, hopefully some regular there has already investigated the reliability of the splc. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 01:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)