Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Alabamaboy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:42, 23 October 2005 editMarkGallagher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,550 edits →[]: support← Previous edit Revision as of 19:19, 23 October 2005 edit undoMindspillage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,675 edits →[]: supportNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
''' ''' ''' '''
'''(16/0/1) ending <nowiki>21:31</nowiki> October 29 (UTC)''' '''(20/0/1) ending <nowiki>21:31</nowiki> October 29 (UTC)'''


{{User|Alabamaboy}} – I would like to nominate Alabamaboy for adminship. As I have strived to apply professional copy editing skills to many poorly worded entries, I have found that many of the people who claim to embrace npov and other directives, including admins, do not always follow it. I have had a couple of issues and arguments over the editing of pages, including an incident where I was banned wrongly by an admin (a second admin recognized this and reinstated me), and it was at the behest of Alabamaboy's mediation that resolution was brought about (although I still think that the page that comes up when banned should be more accomodating to help the bannee protest their banning). That said, even when I disagree with his edits, or vice versa, he shows respect uncommon on Misplaced Pages, and not leaping to the worst conclusions. I have also done a little homework. He has about 2000 edits, and has done a lot of work on literature, especially the South of the U.S. and Black culture. I think he has the temperament, technical skill, and editorial skill to be a good admin. ] 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC) ] 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC) {{User|Alabamaboy}} – I would like to nominate Alabamaboy for adminship. As I have strived to apply professional copy editing skills to many poorly worded entries, I have found that many of the people who claim to embrace npov and other directives, including admins, do not always follow it. I have had a couple of issues and arguments over the editing of pages, including an incident where I was banned wrongly by an admin (a second admin recognized this and reinstated me), and it was at the behest of Alabamaboy's mediation that resolution was brought about (although I still think that the page that comes up when banned should be more accomodating to help the bannee protest their banning). That said, even when I disagree with his edits, or vice versa, he shows respect uncommon on Misplaced Pages, and not leaping to the worst conclusions. I have also done a little homework. He has about 2000 edits, and has done a lot of work on literature, especially the South of the U.S. and Black culture. I think he has the temperament, technical skill, and editorial skill to be a good admin. ] 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC) ] 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Line 27: Line 27:
#'''Support''', good editor. ] ] 18:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', good editor. ] ] 18:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''', good editor and smart bloke. I do, however, echo the concerns of Dylons493 and chowells. --] (]) 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC) #'''Support''', good editor and smart bloke. I do, however, echo the concerns of Dylons493 and chowells. --] (]) 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. His constructive approach is a real asset. ] ] 19:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


'''Oppose''' '''Oppose'''

Revision as of 19:19, 23 October 2005

Alabamaboy

Requests_for_adminship/Alabamaboy|action=edit}} Vote here (20/0/1) ending 21:31 October 29 (UTC)

Alabamaboy (talk · contribs) – I would like to nominate Alabamaboy for adminship. As I have strived to apply professional copy editing skills to many poorly worded entries, I have found that many of the people who claim to embrace npov and other directives, including admins, do not always follow it. I have had a couple of issues and arguments over the editing of pages, including an incident where I was banned wrongly by an admin (a second admin recognized this and reinstated me), and it was at the behest of Alabamaboy's mediation that resolution was brought about (although I still think that the page that comes up when banned should be more accomodating to help the bannee protest their banning). That said, even when I disagree with his edits, or vice versa, he shows respect uncommon on Misplaced Pages, and not leaping to the worst conclusions. I have also done a little homework. He has about 2000 edits, and has done a lot of work on literature, especially the South of the U.S. and Black culture. I think he has the temperament, technical skill, and editorial skill to be a good admin. Iago Dali 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC) Iago Dali 21:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Yes, I accept. Thank you for the nomination.--Alabamaboy 02:09, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support 100%, This is a guy that defended another user against "me" and here I am supporting him, why? Because of his loyalty, determination and dedication to Misplaced Pages. He will make a great admin. Tony the Marine 00:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Super Support, Awesome User... truly deserves it! PRueda29 03:29, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support, We need more cool heads like this Wikipedian. Glad to support this nomination. Vaoverland 03:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support... but dont waste too much time with the turkeys vandals, keep on writing quality articles. Stbalbach 03:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Oran e (t) (c) (@) 04:45, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. -- NSLE (Communicate!) 05:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  7. Sweet user Alabama-boy!, Support from Old Europe. - Darwinek 08:59, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support. —Wayward 09:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  9. Strong Support -JCarriker 09:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  10. Support this nomination for a professional, balanced, reasonable, and extremely polite Wikipedian. Yoninah 09:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support seems like a fair editor, though my personal preference is to allow RfAs to stand on their own without spamming user's talk pages to try and get votes. chowells 11:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support of course. --hydnjo talk 11:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  13. FireFox 13:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support As I nominated him I support him. Iago Dali 13:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support Although Alabamaboy hasn't gotten into the political sides of Misplaced Pages, he also hasn't gotten into the political sides of Misplaced Pages. He's levelheaded and concerned with establishing NPOV, clear articles. Also, it is important that southern literature and African American literature and culture have an administrator angel helping them along. The mop is frequently needed and the bucket frequently full on those subjects (and the articles stunted). Geogre 13:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  16. Whole-hearted Support I had intended not to vote on any other users' RfAs until my own was closed, but this is one I can't pass up. One of the best literature contributors to Misplaced Pages, who keeps his head even in the face of real provocation. Dvyost 15:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  17. Strong support, has been one of the few people doing solid work on African American topics. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support, good editor. Christopher Parham (talk) 18:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support, good editor and smart bloke. I do, however, echo the concerns of Dylons493 and chowells. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support. His constructive approach is a real asset. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 19:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Neutral Nothing personal but I'm uncomfortable with contacting users notifying them of one's Rfa. I objected to this in the recent case of ScottyBoy900Q and, to be consistent, am now opposing again. This slightly different as it's not a self-nom but it would be easy enough to get a nom from someone if one really wanted to be an admin. Adminship shouldn't be a big deal! Dlyons493 Talk 17:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments

  • In response to chowells concerns, my bad on that. I was just trying to let people I'd interacted with over the past half year know about the vote. I'd seen other RfA noms do this and didn't know it was frowned upon. --Alabamaboy 12:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks. It's just a personal preference that I prefer not to see it. As User:Dylons493 said it's probably not as "bad" as a self-nom spamming pages. Anyway, that's it from me -- it was hardly a big deal IMO and you've learnt now that a few people frown on it and after all we are creating Misplaced Pages to learn (I think!) :) chowells 14:22, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. In the past, I have helped with the recent changes patrol and trying to find vandalism. I have also taken part in articles for deletion discussions. I would like to take a larger role in both of these efforts while continuing my work on the Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates page, which (while not an admin chore) I find to be a fascinating yet often overlooked duty here at Misplaced Pages.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I am particularly pleased with African American literature (which was my first featured article), Anti-Tom literature (which is an obscure yet interesting literary subject which no other encyclopdia on earth has probably touched), and Southern literature (a subject close to my heart).
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. After African American literature became a FA, a user had objections to my overall approach on the article. To handle this issue, we had a discussion about the issue. I also brought into the discussion past contributors and reviewers of the article. My approach is to try and discuss any issue in a civilized manner and to bring in other users with an interest in the issue. I firmly believe in the value of reaching consensus on disputed edits.