| Revision as of 09:29, 12 January 2009 editOldelpaso (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,228 edits →Edit warring involving names of football clubs: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:11, 12 January 2009 edit undoNumber 57 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators292,136 edits →Edit warring involving names of football clubs: WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Please stop the ] on ] and elsewhere. Considering you've only just returned from a block, it is foolhardy behaviour indeed. ] (]) 09:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | Please stop the ] on ] and elsewhere. Considering you've only just returned from a block, it is foolhardy behaviour indeed. ] (]) 09:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Please stop it Grant. Another edit like and I'm sorry to say that you will be blocked again. ] ]] 21:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:11, 12 January 2009
Please feel free to leave me a message here and I will respond to it ASAP. Have a good one.
-- Grant.Alpaugh 17:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Contact
Grant - hi, wanted to get in touch with you with regard to your updating of the CONCACAF pages (which is great, by the way). Can you possibly send me a number I can call you on to discuss? My email is danny_peters99@hotmail.com. Best, Danny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djp080306 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
WL
I believe it is time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.219.6.154 (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
ITN
Would you care to rejoin WP:ITN again? All of the kinks have been pretty much ironed out, and I'm an admin now, so there's more quality updates, not just trivial, non-updated junk. Just wanted to throw that out there, Spencer 21:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
CONCACAF CL berths for MLS
I might be thinking about this wrong, but doesn't MLS have three guaranteed berths with the potential for two more? According the official qualification (see MLS's recent press release), the guarantees are MLS Cup winnner, SS winner, and MLS Cup runner-up. MLS can also qualify through USOC but an MLS team may not win that. Also Toronto can qualify through their Canadian tournament. 3 + 2, right?
Also I ordered the qualifying teams Columbus, NY, DC, and Houston as that's the order the press release said was priority for qualification. MLS Cup winner then SS winner then MLS Cup runner up then USOC winner. After that the priority is best regular season point total (thus making Houston last to officially qualify). Just wanted to give some insight into my thoughts. Thanks. --Blackbox77 (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Follow up: I just read what you saw on CONCACAF's website as Houston being 2nd seed. I suppose the order and numbering (or what I interpreted as priority) for qualification in MLS's press release seems misleading. Other than that point, I was listing them the way MLS did. --Blackbox77 (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello? --Blackbox77 (talk) 22:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Do you look at your talk page? --Blackbox77 (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
You had removed from the MLS article my bit about the league having a minimum of 3 automatic entries in CCL with the potential for two more. I was trying to discuss with you whether or not this is correct. --Blackbox77 (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think it would be better to just keep it year to year, especially since these berths are very fluid for the time being (see SuperLiga). -- Grant.Alpaugh 02:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
WL
orbis non sufficit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.219.6.236 (talk) 23:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
CONCACAF Champions League Bracket Template
Excuse me, did you look at the article which I provided in the talk page of 2008–09 article? I quoted an official article hint that the "Round" word have not to be used. Raymond Giggs 05:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to CONCACAF Champions League 2008–09, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. I need you apologize to me! Don't accuse the edits you think correct as vandalism! Raymond Giggs 04:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Raymond Giggs 04:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Landon Donovan
Please stop edit warring at this article. Bayern Munich should be used, not the German version. Please see Misplaced Pages:Naming convention#Sports teams for clarification on why this is the case. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
.
Edit warring involving names of football clubs
Please stop the disruption to make a point on United States men's national soccer team and elsewhere. Considering you've only just returned from a block, it is foolhardy behaviour indeed. Oldelpaso (talk) 09:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please stop it Grant. Another edit like this and I'm sorry to say that you will be blocked again. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)