Revision as of 19:13, 14 January 2009 view sourceAepoutre (talk | contribs)8,625 edits →Incomplete and contested proposals: move the king's college to the king's college new york← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:31, 14 January 2009 view source RegentsPark (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,689 editsm →13 January 2009: fix link to discussionNext edit → | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
*'''] → ]''' —('']'')— The article should be at ] since it is known only by that name, and the bank is known as ]. A short while ago, someone changed the ] redirect to point to the bank, which had the silly and counter-productive result of redirects such as ] pointing to the article on the bank. I've restored the redirects that clearly were meant to point to this article to do so. This includes ] - over a hundred articles that linked to that redirect wer about a rider, a race, or another team. Only two were about banking or finance. The handful of articles meant to link to ] already do link to that article. If nothing else, this is a pretty clear case of ]. Putting the cycling team at ] is in the best interests of the smooth functioning of Misplaced Pages. --] <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''] → ]''' —('']'')— The article should be at ] since it is known only by that name, and the bank is known as ]. A short while ago, someone changed the ] redirect to point to the bank, which had the silly and counter-productive result of redirects such as ] pointing to the article on the bank. I've restored the redirects that clearly were meant to point to this article to do so. This includes ] - over a hundred articles that linked to that redirect wer about a rider, a race, or another team. Only two were about banking or finance. The handful of articles meant to link to ] already do link to that article. If nothing else, this is a pretty clear case of ]. Putting the cycling team at ] is in the best interests of the smooth functioning of Misplaced Pages. --] <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''] → ]''' —('']'')— Because of its high frequency of occurance in the English language, the word "split" could easily qualify as a valid name for many Misplaced Pages articles. In fact, there is already a ] page that contains an extensive list of such articles. On the Split talk page, I have given statistical evidence that strongly supports the validity of renaming ]—which is an article about a city—to ]. Commensurate with this proposed change would be the inclusion of ] on the existing dab. --] (]) 01:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''] → ]''' —('']'')— Because of its high frequency of occurance in the English language, the word "split" could easily qualify as a valid name for many Misplaced Pages articles. In fact, there is already a ] page that contains an extensive list of such articles. On the Split talk page, I have given statistical evidence that strongly supports the validity of renaming ]—which is an article about a city—to ]. Commensurate with this proposed change would be the inclusion of ] on the existing dab. --] (]) 01:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
===] ]=== | ===] ]=== |
Revision as of 20:31, 14 January 2009
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Misplaced Pages. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.
Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics.
Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:
- Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
- Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
- A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
- A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
- Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.
Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved." When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.
Misplaced Pages:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
When not to use this page
ShortcutsSeparate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:
- Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves.
- Renaming a category – propose the move at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion.
- Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion.
- Renaming an image or other file – see Misplaced Pages:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
- Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: add
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article. See Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself. - Merging two articles – make a request at Misplaced Pages:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Splitting an article – make a request at Misplaced Pages:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Misplaced Pages:Requests for history merge.
- Contesting a move request close – use the Misplaced Pages:Move review process.
Undiscussed moves
ShortcutsAutoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:
- No article exists at the new target title;
- There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
- It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.
If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.
Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.
Uncontroversial proposals
Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any reasonable possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required. If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.
Incomplete and contested proposals
With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move proposal, please do not discuss move proposals here. If you support an incomplete or contested move proposal, please consider following the instructions above to complete the proposal, and move it to the "Other Proposals" section below, normally under the earliest date on which all instructions have been completed. Proposals that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.
- The King's College → The King's College (New York) —(Discuss)— In light of The King's College (California), this would be the proper course of action per WP:UNIGUIDE --Aepoutre (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC) --Aepoutre (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Adam Divello → Adam DiVello —(Discuss)— Misspelled. Adam DiVello is official spelling as per IMDBcitation
- Sundarlal Bahuguna → Sunderlal Bahuguna —(Discuss)— Official spelling as per Right Livelihood Award citation and newspaper article --Ekabhishek (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Grihapravesam (1976) → Grihapravesam — Dab page is rather unnecessary, and redundant to the hatnote in the article. — PC78 (talk) 12:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- The dab page was just created two days ago. Have you tried discussing this with the creator of the dab page?--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 14:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Why would that be necessary? There is no other use of Grihapravesam on Misplaced Pages, and even the hatnote is pushing it. We're not a dictionary of Tamil words. PC78 (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- The dab page was just created two days ago. Have you tried discussing this with the creator of the dab page?--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 14:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Fars (disambiguation) → Fars —(Discuss)— no primary meaning --DmitTrix (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Incomplete. Perhaps Fars Province is the primary use? Sam (talk) 09:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- While most (or all) Iran-related usages of "Fars" originate from the Persian root meaning "Persian" ("Farsi"), and the largest Persian empire originated in the region now known as Fars province, it still doesn't make this usage to be primary. Additionally, the acronym "FARS" is widely used (e.g. referring to Fatality Analysis Reporting System and Federal Aviation Regulations) --DmitTrix (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Incomplete. Perhaps Fars Province is the primary use? Sam (talk) 09:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Backwoods (TV film) → Backwoods — Latter redirects to the former. — PC78 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Backwoods has been turned into a dab page. Parsecboy (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Move no longer necessary. Gary King (talk) 07:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Backwoods has been turned into a dab page. Parsecboy (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Star Fox (SNES) → Star Fox (video game) - No one seems to oppose it. As it stands, Star Fox (video game) is a disambig page between two articles - one is only notable because of its relation to the SNES game, and the other is the SNES game, and is a highly-regarded, award-winning, best-selling video game released by a well-known publisher for one of the most well-known systems ever made, spawning several sequels, most recently for the Nintendo DS. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Is there a link to discussion? Parsecboy (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is the only one - Misplaced Pages talk:Video games#Move proposal: Star Fox (SNES) to Star Fox (video game), and had very little input. I just decided to put it here because it's not a simple move (ie a typo or capitalization error, but something that deals with POV). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Is there a link to discussion? Parsecboy (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Other proposals
Please use the correct template; see the instructions above. Do not attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing. |
Purge the cache to refresh this page
14 January 2009
- Hugh Beaumont (actor) → Hugh Beaumont —(Discuss)— Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The other Hugh Beaumont was "universally known as Binkie", see Binkie Beaumont. — CharlotteWebb 18:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Roma (Romani subgroup) → Roma (people) —(Discuss)— This is part of a complex solution suggested originally at Talk:Roma people#New request; the current article name is the result of a "bold" action which did not have consensus support, and revived a previously AfD'd version. --Zalktis (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sami Mohy El Din Muhammed Al Hajj -> Sami al-Hajj, as per agreement with Wikiproject:Terrorism and others, names should not be spread out to six or seven names for Arab terror suspects (in this case wrongly accused) anymore than they should be for Abraham Lincoln as it broaches NPOV to list "crazy" names for each of these people, stretching back generations, when they routinely refer to themselves by shorter names, as in this case, "Sami al-Hajj". Sherurcij 18:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Guri i Zi → Crni Kamen Peak —(Discuss)— This is more common name of this mountain peak, used both in Serbian and Macedonian (see Naming_conventions). It is also more neutral, regarding NPOV, as the name "Guri i Zi" is controversial as is never used in Serbia, nor Macedonia. --Vanjagenije (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Ethnic and cultural conflicts noticeboard → Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Ethnic and cultural conflicts —(Discuss)— Inactive page, as people are posting these pages on WP:AN, WP:ANI, and WP:AN3 anyways. They best chance of this page being used by WP is to move it to a subpage of WP:AN. --~ JohnnyMrNinja 15:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Territorial acquisitions of the United States → Territorial changes of the United States —(Discuss)— I think it would be a good idea to match this article to the current format of Territorial changes of Poland and Territorial changes of Germany, and to discuss changes to the United States Territory that weren't additions. --Chris M. (talk) 08:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Democratic–Republican Party → Democratic-Republican Party —(Discuss)— This page was moved in September from the hyphenated version to a dash version without discussion and with a summary reference to "WP:DASH". "Democratic-Republican" should be hyphenated, and nothing at WP:MOS contradicts that. Edits to the talk page after the move require an admin to move. --Rrius (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Feminine essence theory of transsexuality → Woman trapped in a man's body —(Discuss)— "Woman trapped in a man's body" was coined in 1868 and appears in at least 228 published sources in those 140 years. It has appeared 305 times in the mainstream press and has 7,590 Google hits. "Feminine essence theory" was coined in 2008 and appeared in 2 sources in those 7 months. It’s never appeared in the mainstream press and has 9 Google hits. --Jokestress (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
13 January 2009
- Ceramic → Ceramic materials —(Discuss)— The article is about ceramic materials. The new title would clearly place the article alongside Ceramic engineering and Ceramic art --Marshall46 (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Bitch and the Exciting Conclusion → Bitch (performer) —(Discuss)— Source article is clearly about the artist, and not the artist's recently-formed band. The artist has a clear assertion of notability in Bitch and Animal, and this article makes a claim of notability outside of that musical duo. The current article at Bitch (performer) is a single-edit redirect to Bitch and Animal with "redirect until solo article is written" entered as the edit description. --Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- List of Gladiators events → List of Gladiators UK events —(Discuss)— This list concerns the UK edition, not the exactly the same named Australian edition, or the similarly named US, South African, etc editions. --76.66.198.171 (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Norio Minorikawa → Monta Mino —(Discuss)— The subject's widely-used professional name is Monta Mino (Mino Monta in Japanese). While this person is one of the most well-known faces on Japanese TV, I doubt that many Japanese people would even know who Norio Minorikawa was. --DAJF (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sinhala alphabet → Sinhala script —(Discuss)— The Sinhala writing system is an abugida and not an alphabet in the strict sense. Script is a more general term, which avoids potential confusion, while still making sense to the average reader --Jasy jatere (talk) 12:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Chinese imperialism → Territorial expansions in the history of China —(Discuss)— Suggest refocusing the topic of the article. See talk page. --Voidvector (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Uthman Ibn Affan → Uthman ibn Affan —(Discuss)— Lowercase "ibn" seems to be more correct, but I'm no expert. --Quuxplusone (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Caisse d'Epargne (cycling team) → Caisse d'Epargne —(Discuss)— The article should be at Caisse d'Epargne since it is known only by that name, and the bank is known as Groupe Caisse d'Epargne. A short while ago, someone changed the Caisse d'Epargne redirect to point to the bank, which had the silly and counter-productive result of redirects such as Banesto (cycling team) pointing to the article on the bank. I've restored the redirects that clearly were meant to point to this article to do so. This includes Caisse d'Epargne - over a hundred articles that linked to that redirect wer about a rider, a race, or another team. Only two were about banking or finance. The handful of articles meant to link to Groupe Caisse d'Epargne already do link to that article. If nothing else, this is a pretty clear case of WP:IAR. Putting the cycling team at Caisse d'Epargne is in the best interests of the smooth functioning of Misplaced Pages. --Don't fall asleep 01:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Split → Split (city) —(Discuss)— Because of its high frequency of occurance in the English language, the word "split" could easily qualify as a valid name for many Misplaced Pages articles. In fact, there is already a Split (disambiguation) page that contains an extensive list of such articles. On the Split talk page, I have given statistical evidence that strongly supports the validity of renaming Split—which is an article about a city—to Split (city). Commensurate with this proposed change would be the inclusion of Split (city) on the existing dab. --Lambtron (talk) 01:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
12 January 2009
- Joseph Henry Engle → Joe Engle —(Discuss)— The article, as well as the cited bio at NASA , refer to him as Joe Henry Engle. Most references simply use "Joe Engle" (as did the original page title in 2006) and that follows WP article naming guidelines. At least 2 users raised this before and nothing appears to have been done about it. (I might have moved it back myself but there's a 2nd edit on Talk because of a fixed dble re-direct) --RCEberwein | Talk 16:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mali i Zhlebit → Žljeb mountain —(Discuss)— Žljeb mountain is better known name of this mountain. On search, Žljeb gives 69,300 hits , or Žljeb mountain that gives 322 hits, while "Mali i Zhlebit" ] gives only 4, wiki being 2 of them!!! The name Mali i Zhlebit is also controversial and is never used in Serbia, while the name Žljeb is more neutral, and accurate. --Tadija (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Music Is My Hot, Hot Sex → Music Is My Hot Hot Sex —(Discuss)— The name of the track given on the album itself lacks the comma. Note that for the track "This Month, Day 10" the artwork does show the comma, which indicates the lack of the comma is not part of the album artwork's style. --Icalanise (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Track marshal → Motorsport marshal —(Discuss)— The proposal of this is to merge this rally marshal and auto race workers into one single article as other than the type of circuit they work in, there are very little difference between the three --Donnie Park (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- The Game (2000 TV series) → The Game (Australian TV series) —(Discuss)— A better title for the article (already exists as a redirect), especially since the show was broadcast from 2000 to 2001 --03:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC) SEO
- English Rugby Union Leagues → English Rugby Union Leagues 2008-09 —(Discuss)— An article of this title should detail the structure of the English Rugby Union Leagues with a proper history. This is just a collection of the current season's tables and should be an individual season article. --Dancarney (talk) 10:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Insufficient discussion, relisting. Parsecboy (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- STAR TV (Asia) → STAR (broadcaster) or Star (Broadcaster) —(Discuss)— The company is now simply known as STAR. However, I don't know which is proper. —JSH-alive 07:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Insufficient discussion, relisting. Parsecboy (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
11 January 2009
- Hanover → Hannover —(Discuss)— The spelling with double n has become more common in English --3247 (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- American Harpy Eagle → Harpy Eagle —(Discuss)— All major check-lists (incl. the de facto standard per wikiproj. birds) use the shorter Harpy Eagle (which currently redirects to American Harpy Eagle), as do all field guides published to the region. Google results also show the primary use of the short version. A longer summary of check-lists, field guides, google-results, etc, in the move proposal on Talk:American Harpy Eagle --• Rabo³ • 21:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- List of Earls → List of earls —(Discuss)— Earls is a common noun, and should not be capitalized when used in this sense. Earl of X and Earls of X should be capitalized, but the generic "earls" not. Contested, so discussion started at talk page. --Fram (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Charles Peter Wagner → C. Peter Wagner —(Discuss)— Restores this page name to the name by which this individual is commonly known; published author known by only this name with a leading initial. --Mike Doughney (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Cansei de Ser Sexy → CSS (band) —(Discuss)— The band name as given on their own website is CSS, and this seems to be the form used in the majority of review websites, e.g. . --Icalanise (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Tamburica → Tamburitza —(Discuss)— It is a common spelling in English. --Vanjagenije (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dasht (disambiguation) → Dasht —(Discuss)— no primary meaning --Bejnar (talk) 08:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Gladiators (2008 TV series) → Gladiators (2008 UK TV series) — (Discuss) -- There are *two* 2008 TV shows called "Gladiators", one being this one, the other being Gladiators (2008 Australian TV series), so having this one at this name is prejudicial against the Australian one. Further, it could be confused with the American Gladiators (2008 TV series) --76.66.198.171 (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
10 January 2009
- UVERworld → Uverworld —(Discuss)— Japanese MOS, which states "no words should not be written in all caps in the English Misplaced Pages." --(Moon) and (Sunrise) 21:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Or (disambiguation) → Or —(Discuss)— There is no primary usage for either "Or" or "OR": I have just tidied up a mess of links intended for Or (heraldry), Oregon, etc as well as logic/electronics and other uses (Or was a redirect to Logical disjunction until I WP:Boldly changed it). The dab page was at Or until May 2007. --PamD (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- The High Road → The High Road (Album by JoJo) —(Discuss)— There are multiple subjects with this general title and it is difficult to find them if one is using it exclusively.Trilobitealive (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hydronium → Hydroxonium, also make Hydronium a redirect to Hydron (chemistry) —(Discuss)— current view of terms is confusing. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Discrimination against atheists → Situation of atheists —(Discuss)— To take concerns about original research into account (it is not sufficiently shown that topics discussed actually constitute discrimination) --13:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Zara1709 (talk)
- Note that the talk page consensus is against this. Verbal chat 14:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Minister for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works (Greece) → Minister for the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works (Greece) —(Discuss)— "Physical planning", and not "spacial planning", is the most recognised common for this entity, which uses physical planning on its own website. The page was changed to spacial planning some days ago without any prior discussion. --Damac (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Box office number-one films of year (country) → ? — (Discuss) — Proposed move for a series of some 50+ articles (listed below). These are all lists; per WP:SAL the article titles should all begin with "List of...", and I believe it is also possible to remove the parenthetical disambiguators. However, a preferred alternative is yet to be determined. Discussion was started at WT:FILM a week ago, but I am now listing here for further input. PC78 (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Box office number-one films of 1982 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1983 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1984 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1985 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1986 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1987 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1988 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1989 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1990 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1991 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1992 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1993 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1994 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1995 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1996 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1997 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1998 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1999 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2000 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2001 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2002 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2003 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2004 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2005 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2006 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2007 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 2009 (USA)
- Box office number-one films of 1997 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 1998 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 1999 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2000 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2001 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2002 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2003 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2004 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2005 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2006 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2007 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 2009 (UK)
- Box office number-one films of 1998 (Australia)
- Box office number-one films of 1999 (Australia)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (Australia)
- Box office number-one films of 2009 (Australia)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (Philippines)
- Box office number-one films of 2009 (Philippines)
- Box office number-one films of 2006 (South Korea)
- Box office number-one films of 2007 (South Korea)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (South Korea)
- Box office number-one films of 2005 (Canada)
- Box office number-one films of 2006 (Canada)
- Box office number-one films of 2007 (Canada)
- Box office number-one films of 2008 (Canada)
- Box office number-one films of 2009 (Canada)
- Cyber (subculture) → Cybergoth —(Discuss)— No sources are provided for the subculture "cyber", which is vaguely defined and supported by original research, whereas "cybergoth" is supported by sources and has a clear genealogy. Aryder779 (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
9 January 2009
- Merovingian → Merovingians —(Discuss)— The plural form seems more natural when dealing with a group of people, seemingly in line with Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (plurals)'s exceptions, and matches the article's content. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Republic of Ireland-UK border → Ireland-UK border —(Discuss)— A more accurate and neutral title. --AEHAS (talk) 23:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Western Pacific Cordillera → ? —(Discuss)— The current title is original research, it does not exist. A simple Google search only returns hits from Misplaced Pages —76.66.198.171 (talk) 23:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Robertian dynasty → Robertians —(Discuss)— Robertians beats Robertian dynasty by a country mile on Google books and Google scholar, and this used to be called Robertians until moved without discussion 18 months ago. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Eurasian Black Vulture → Cinereous Vulture —(Discuss)— More common name, and IOC World Name List preferred name. ---- Kim van der Linde 23:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Bosonid dynasty → Bosonids —(Discuss)— I can't recall seeing anything but "Bosonids" in print. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- South West Africa People's Organization → SWAPO —(Discuss)— Everybody knows this party as SWAPO, not South West Africa People's Organization. Even the media refers to SWAPO. It would be better if we use the acronym. The page would also display better. --Slapsnot (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Psychological Propaganda Set M-91 → Psihološko propagandni komplet M-91 —(Discuss)— Foreign albums' names should not be translated, per WP:OR (no original research), WP:ALBUM ("The article name should be the title of the album"), and WP:UCN (use common names). Album articles are at the title of the albums, not at a translation of the title. Misplaced Pages doesn't allow for editors to unilaterally translate titles of any works with prior establishment of usage on the album itself. --Vanjagenije (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Orca → Killer Whale —(Discuss)— In a nutshell, per current consensus to use MSW3 names. --Tombstone (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Backlog
Move dated sections here after five days have passed (December 19 or older).
- Danah Boyd → danah boyd —(Discuss)— There are multiple reliable sources that use each capitalization but the MOS clearly states that we should use the subject's preferred orthography in these cases. --ElKevbo (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Financial crisis of 2007–2008 → Financial crisis of 2007–2009 —(Discuss)— The financial crisis is still not over, and we're in 2009. --Eivind (t) 22:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lovisa of Sweden → Louise of Sweden - (Discuss) - per Misplaced Pages:Common usage - This queen is known as Louise in English (the only relevant language when it comes to this Misplaced Pages), Danish (language of the country she was queen of), and Swedish (language of her homeland), therefore I have no idea why this article is called Lovisa of Sweden. Surtsicna (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pridi Phanomyong → Pridi Banomyong —(Discuss)— Preferred spelling can easily be demonstrated via a Google test (247,000 results for "Pridi Banomyong" vs 7,540 for "Pridi Phanomyong"). Sources such as A History of Thailand by Chris Baker and Phasuk Phongpaichit also follow this spelling. --Paul_012 20:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Indo-Greek Kingdom → Indo-Greeks —(Discuss)— Whether this was one kingdom or several kingdoms is uncertain, and very likely varied over time. No objection yet, but the target has been edited. --Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wallaby Test Match Results → List of Australia national rugby union team test match results — (Discuss) — Should be moved to be in line with parent article Australia national rugby union team. Naming it after the teams nickname, even if very common, seems wrong. EA210269 (talk) 05:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ø Story → ? —(Discuss)— Current name violates WP:TM. The official site uses "0 Story", but the title is supposed to mean "Love Story" (which would need to be disambiguated to "Love Story (video game)" —TJ Spyke 06:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted. Still a puzzler.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Roma people → Roma (people) —(Discuss)— Current title grammatically incorrect. New article refers to a sub-set of Romani people. RashersTierney (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- New request: Roma (Romani subgroup) → Roma (people)
- New request not by RashersTierney nor me; I am merely noting the change. --Una Smith (talk) 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- English Qabalah → Latin alphabet gematria —(Discuss)— The current name seems inaccurate and fuels sectarian conflict. --Dan (talk) 09:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)