| Revision as of 17:28, 18 January 2009 editScarykitty (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,160 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:08, 18 January 2009 edit undoJulesH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,584 edits →Lesbian-identifiedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Merge''' - useful info that doesn't need to have its own article. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' - useful info that doesn't need to have its own article. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' - seems like a lot of the content would be more appropriate for ]. Not to re open the merge debate, but as I set about to do the work, that's what occurs to me. ] (]) 17:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - seems like a lot of the content would be more appropriate for ]. Not to re open the merge debate, but as I set about to do the work, that's what occurs to me. ] (]) 17:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy close''' / '''merge'''. Last discussion was only a month ago. I see no reason to believe consensus has changed in the meantime. Give it time for consensus to settle down over whether this should be merged or not, and give editors on the articles in question time to perform the merge. ] (]) 19:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:08, 18 January 2009
Lesbian-identified
AfDs for this article:- Lesbian-identified (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Previous discussion had a pretty much overwhelming decision to merge, though there doesn't seem to be enough material to do much with in the mergeto article. Or not enough interest. Delete SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Merge - useful info that doesn't need to have its own article. Panyd 17:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - seems like a lot of the content would be more appropriate for Transgender. Not to re open the merge debate, but as I set about to do the work, that's what occurs to me. Scarykitty (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy close / merge. Last discussion was only a month ago. I see no reason to believe consensus has changed in the meantime. Give it time for consensus to settle down over whether this should be merged or not, and give editors on the articles in question time to perform the merge. JulesH (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)