| Revision as of 03:29, 20 January 2009 editJJL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,749 edits →Renzo Gracie Legacy: kp← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:07, 20 January 2009 edit undoMichaelQSchmidt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users60,150 edits →Renzo Gracie Legacy: KEEPNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . ] (]) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . ] (]) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Extreme keep''' as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the ], just as you won't read about ] in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper. ''']''' '']'' 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''' '']'' 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:07, 20 January 2009
Renzo Gracie Legacy
- Renzo Gracie Legacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet WP:FILM - only claim to notability is that the subject of the documentary is notable. Admittedly self-distributed and released with "little or no marketing" on a web site. No third-party sources. Graymornings(talk) 21:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - no sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: no reliable independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . JJL (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Extreme keep as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the Washington Post, just as you won't read about Barrack Obama in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper. Schmidt, 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Schmidt, 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Categories: