| Revision as of 05:00, 19 January 2009 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →Diversity_and_inclusion: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:52, 20 January 2009 edit undoJuliancolton (talk | contribs)Administrators130,415 edits Closing debate, result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. –] ] ] 23:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity_and_inclusion}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity_and_inclusion}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|Diversity_and_inclusion}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Diversity_and_inclusion}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as original research. But I don't see that this page is a verbatim copy of substantially all of the boston.com article. - ] (]) 15:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as original research. But I don't see that this page is a verbatim copy of substantially all of the boston.com article. - ] (]) 15:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Essay, original research (or original synthesis of research, in any case), and hopelessly POV. ] (]) 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Essay, original research (or original synthesis of research, in any case), and hopelessly POV. ] (]) 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 23:52, 20 January 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton 23:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Diversity_and_inclusion
AfDs for this article:- Diversity_and_inclusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Complete OR, sources either don't mention the "concept", or are advertising. I can't think of a way to turn this into an encyclopedic entry. Dendlai (talk) 06:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC
- Delete It appears to be WP:synthesis if not original research. The subjects are already covered sufficiently by Multiculturalism and the other articles linked to the disambiguation pages Diversity and Inclusive. It also appears to be largely redundant given the article Diversity training.Synchronism (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Or speedy delete as a copyright violation of http://www.boston.com/jobs/nehra/043007.shtml.Synchronism (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as original research. But I don't see that this page is a verbatim copy of substantially all of the boston.com article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Essay, original research (or original synthesis of research, in any case), and hopelessly POV. KleenupKrew (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.