| Revision as of 18:08, 23 January 2009 editMichig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,060 edits →Element Skateboards: Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:07, 23 January 2009 edit undoCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,034 edits →Element Skateboards: keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Keep''' after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of ] because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of ] and ] as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--] ]/] 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of ] because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of ] and ] as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--] ]/] 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--] (]) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--] (]) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. ] (]) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:07, 23 January 2009
Element Skateboards
- Element Skateboards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
clearly an ad, runs afoul of at the very least WP:ADVERT and WP:N Aurush kazemini 06:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete spamvertising. JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of WP:N because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--S Marshall /Cont 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--Michig (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. Cunard (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)