| Revision as of 06:15, 7 December 2008 editLuckz (talk | contribs)373 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:28, 26 January 2009 edit undoDavamb (talk | contribs)27 edits removed sentence stating that the loss of territory was beneficial for sweden, which is pure nonsense!Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| According to the treaty Sweden ceded parts of the provinces ] and ] (east of ] and ]), ], and all provinces east thereof. The ceded territories came to constitute the ], to which also the Russian 18th century conquests of ], including small parts of ] and ] (later to be called '']''), were joined in 1812 as ]. Together with the ] (1809), and the Oath of the Sovereign , the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the ] Grand Duchy, its own administration and institutions, and thereby a start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish culture, to equal position of the ], and ultimately in 1917 to Finland's ]. | According to the treaty Sweden ceded parts of the provinces ] and ] (east of ] and ]), ], and all provinces east thereof. The ceded territories came to constitute the ], to which also the Russian 18th century conquests of ], including small parts of ] and ] (later to be called '']''), were joined in 1812 as ]. Together with the ] (1809), and the Oath of the Sovereign , the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the ] Grand Duchy, its own administration and institutions, and thereby a start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish culture, to equal position of the ], and ultimately in 1917 to Finland's ]. | ||
| A reference to ]'s promise to retain old laws and privileges in Finland was included, but the treaty overstepped any formal guarantees of the legal position of Finland's inhabitants. The Russians refused, and the Swedes were not in a position to insist. Similar clauses had been common in peace treaties, but they were also regularly circumvented. At the period of ], 90 years later, the Russian government argued that the treaty wasn't violated and hence no outside party had any right to intervene, the question being solely a matter of the ] who had granted the original promise. |
A reference to ]'s promise to retain old laws and privileges in Finland was included, but the treaty overstepped any formal guarantees of the legal position of Finland's inhabitants. The Russians refused, and the Swedes were not in a position to insist. Similar clauses had been common in peace treaties, but they were also regularly circumvented. At the period of ], 90 years later, the Russian government argued that the treaty wasn't violated and hence no outside party had any right to intervene, the question being solely a matter of the ] who had granted the original promise. | ||
| During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had namely endeavoured to escape the loss of the Åland islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as ] rightly described them. The Åland islands were culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time. In the course of the 19th century it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a ] interest, which after the ] led to the ] of the islands according to the ] included in the ]. During the ], Russia and Sweden concluded an alliance directed against Imperial France (], ]). They planned to effect a landing in ], which had been overrun by the French. Russia promised to press ] into ceding ] to Sweden. It was understood that ] would join the treaty too, but this never came to pass. Other plans failed to materialise due to ]. | During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had namely endeavoured to escape the loss of the Åland islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as ] rightly described them. The Åland islands were culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time. In the course of the 19th century it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a ] interest, which after the ] led to the ] of the islands according to the ] included in the ]. During the ], Russia and Sweden concluded an alliance directed against Imperial France (], ]). They planned to effect a landing in ], which had been overrun by the French. Russia promised to press ] into ceding ] to Sweden. It was understood that ] would join the treaty too, but this never came to pass. Other plans failed to materialise due to ]. | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 26 January 2009
The Treaty of Fredrikshamn or the Treaty of Hamina was a peace treaty concluded between Sweden and Imperial Russia on September 17, 1809. The treaty concluded the Finnish War and was signed in the Finnish town of Hamina (Fredrikshamn in Swedish). Russia was represented by Nikolai Rumyantsev and David Alopaeus (Russian ambassador to Stockholm), while Sweden by Infantry General Kurt von Stedingk (former Swedish ambassador to Petersburg) and Colonel Anders Skjöldebrand.
According to the treaty Sweden ceded parts of the provinces Lappland and Västerbotten (east of Tornio River and Muonio River), Åland, and all provinces east thereof. The ceded territories came to constitute the Grand Duchy of Finland, to which also the Russian 18th century conquests of Karelia, including small parts of Nyland and Savonia (later to be called Old Finland), were joined in 1812 as Viborg County. Together with the Diet of Porvoo (1809), and the Oath of the Sovereign , the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the autonomous Grand Duchy, its own administration and institutions, and thereby a start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish culture, to equal position of the Finnish language, and ultimately in 1917 to Finland's independence.
A reference to Emperor Alexander's promise to retain old laws and privileges in Finland was included, but the treaty overstepped any formal guarantees of the legal position of Finland's inhabitants. The Russians refused, and the Swedes were not in a position to insist. Similar clauses had been common in peace treaties, but they were also regularly circumvented. At the period of Russification of Finland, 90 years later, the Russian government argued that the treaty wasn't violated and hence no outside party had any right to intervene, the question being solely a matter of the emperor who had granted the original promise. During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had namely endeavoured to escape the loss of the Åland islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as Napoleon rightly described them. The Åland islands were culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time. In the course of the 19th century it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a British interest, which after the Crimean War led to the demilitarization of the islands according to the Åland Convention included in the Treaty of Paris (1856). During the Second War against Napoleon, Russia and Sweden concluded an alliance directed against Imperial France (5 April, 1812). They planned to effect a landing in Swedish Pomerania, which had been overrun by the French. Russia promised to press Denmark into ceding Norway to Sweden. It was understood that Great Britain would join the treaty too, but this never came to pass. Other plans failed to materialise due to Napoleon's invasion of Russia.
References
- Похлебкин В.В. Внешняя политика Руси, России и СССР за 1000 лет в именах, датах, фактах: Справочник. - М.: Междунар. отношения, 1995.