| Revision as of 22:55, 28 October 2005 editHighest-Authority-on-Joan-of-Arc-Related-Scholarship (talk | contribs)163 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:56, 28 October 2005 edit undoHighest-Authority-on-Joan-of-Arc-Related-Scholarship (talk | contribs)163 editsm →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Welcome to the fray! You seem to have picked up that there has been significant dispute about this article in the past: be prepared for people to jump down your throat. ] | ] 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | Welcome to the fray! You seem to have picked up that there has been significant dispute about this article in the past: be prepared for people to jump down your throat. ] | ] 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Your changes at ] (either already made or suggested) are very much appreciated! Please edit boldly! As I mentioned at ] this article should be polished to fit an encyclopedia. Be aware of ], a self-proclaimed expert on Joan of Arc. He's a conservative catholic devoter of ''Saint'' Joan of Arc and a homo-phobe. He now acts under anonymous AOL-accounts and at least one ] - ] 22:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | :Your changes at ] (either already made or suggested) are very much appreciated! Please edit boldly! As I mentioned at ] this article should be polished to fit an encyclopedia. Be aware of ], a self-proclaimed expert on Joan of Arc. He's a conservative catholic devoter of ''Saint'' Joan of Arc and a homo-phobe. He now acts under anonymous AOL-accounts and at least one ] - ] 22:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::I've just changed some suspisious edits by an anonymous user (from comparing his use of language, I believe it is ]) back to your version of ]. I know for sure he will revert them again. On that account it's an never ending story. Reading your edits, I'm convinced you are a '''true''' expert on the subject. ] 22:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | ::I've just changed some suspisious edits by an anonymous user (from comparing his use of language, I believe it is ]) back to your version of ]. I know for sure he will revert them again. On that account it's an never ending story. Reading your edits, I'm convinced you are a '''true''' expert on the subject. ] 22:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 28 October 2005
Welcome!
Hi Durova! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Noisy | Talk 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Joan of Arc
Welcome to the fray! You seem to have picked up that there has been significant dispute about this article in the past: be prepared for people to jump down your throat. Noisy | Talk 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Your changes at Joan of Arc (either already made or suggested) are very much appreciated! Please edit boldly! As I mentioned at Talk:Joan of Arc#Tone this article should be polished to fit an encyclopedia. Be aware of AWilliamson, a self-proclaimed expert on Joan of Arc. He's a conservative catholic devoter of Saint Joan of Arc and a homo-phobe. He now acts under anonymous AOL-accounts and at least one sock puppet - HAJARS 22:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just changed some suspisious edits by an anonymous user (from comparing his use of language, I believe it is AWilliamson) back to your version of the article. I know for sure he will revert them again. On that account it's an never ending story. Reading your edits, I'm convinced you are a true expert on the subject. HAJARS 22:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)