| Revision as of 15:41, 7 January 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:Pytom/Archives.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 2 February 2009 edit undoBuffs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,425 edits feedback requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| You are a user who responded to ]. As someone interested in the discussion a ''']''' has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 23:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | You are a user who responded to ]. As someone interested in the discussion a ''']''' has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 23:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Final version== | |||
| As a contributor to ], I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:23, 2 February 2009
Sections of this page older than 31 days are automatically archived.
AfD nomination of Global Virtual Aviation Community
An article that you have been involved in editing, Global Virtual Aviation Community, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Global Virtual Aviation Community. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
Fox News Channel controversies
Please join me at the talk page and explain what exactly you meant in your edit summary. There is no reliability issue and the Daily Show is a very notable political satire show. Would you agree that at least a mention should be there, if perhaps a much shorter one? Thanks.PelleSmith (talk) 20:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again
They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan
Bonjour, Bravo pour cette image. Pouvez-vous la déposer sur COMMONS pour être utilisable sur autres sites wikipedia étrangers ? Merci
Hello, Congratulations for this nice picture. Can you put it on COMMONS ti be re-usable in different foreign wikipedia project ? Thanks --Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I actually tried, but was unable to get into my commons account. If there's some easy way to get this over on Commons, please let me know... it's public domain, so it shouldn't be a problem moving this there. — PyTom (talk) 07:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, continue to try. It would be better that this image be moved on COMMONS under your signature. If impossible next week, I could try to do that under my own signature. See you later--Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I found another version already on COMMONS, but without GLORY
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/Image:A-Train_satellites.jpg
- --Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, continue to try. It would be better that this image be moved on COMMONS under your signature. If impossible next week, I could try to do that under my own signature. See you later--Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've added this one to commons under the same filename. — PyTom (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- OK, fine, thanks. I've added to the French version of the article.--Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've added this one to commons under the same filename. — PyTom (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
New straw poll
You are a user who responded to RFC: Use of logos on sports team pages. As someone interested in the discussion a new straw poll has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. — BQZip01 — 23:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Final version
As a contributor to the discussion regarding sports team logos, I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. — BQZip01 — 21:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)