| Revision as of 22:01, 25 October 2005 editPurplefeltangel (talk | contribs)2,098 editsm Stub-sorting. You can help!← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:31, 29 October 2005 edit undoDV8 2XL (talk | contribs)6,808 editsm linkfixNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Some observers claimed to see a considerable overlap between opponents of ] and supporters of ] during the ]. Others link the anti-nuclear movement to currents within the ] who want the West (particularly the U.S.) to stop using so much energy and get back to simpler things. | Some observers claimed to see a considerable overlap between opponents of ] and supporters of ] during the ]. Others link the anti-nuclear movement to currents within the ] who want the West (particularly the U.S.) to stop using so much energy and get back to simpler things. | ||
| Critics of |
Critics of unilatireal disarmament felt that the practice would not have the heralded effect but would encourage ] aggression (abroad) and facilitate repression internally. | ||
| Critics of the "back to nature" element among environmentalists often feel that it's either (a) misguided earth worship which puts people second and nature first or (b) a trick by redistributionist ] to get the U.S. to transfer 100s of billions of dollars of wealth annually to ] governments. | Critics of the "back to nature" element among environmentalists often feel that it's either (a) misguided earth worship which puts people second and nature first or (b) a trick by redistributionist ] to get the U.S. to transfer 100s of billions of dollars of wealth annually to ] governments. | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 29 October 2005
The anti-nuclear movement holds that nuclear power is inherently dangerous and thus ought to be "replaced with safe and affordable renewable energy."
Some observers claimed to see a considerable overlap between opponents of nuclear power and supporters of unilateral disarmament during the Cold War. Others link the anti-nuclear movement to currents within the environmentalist movement who want the West (particularly the U.S.) to stop using so much energy and get back to simpler things.
Critics of unilatireal disarmament felt that the practice would not have the heralded effect but would encourage Soviet aggression (abroad) and facilitate repression internally.
Critics of the "back to nature" element among environmentalists often feel that it's either (a) misguided earth worship which puts people second and nature first or (b) a trick by redistributionist socialists to get the U.S. to transfer 100s of billions of dollars of wealth annually to third world governments.
See:
 | This activism-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |