Revision as of 12:14, 28 December 2008 editMisterx2000 (talk | contribs)5,136 edits →See also: {{law-term-stub}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:35, 5 February 2009 edit undo192.149.109.60 (talk) →Notable casesNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Notable cases == | == Notable cases == | ||
can anyone just put garbage of this site | |||
*Sherbert, 1963 | *Sherbert, 1963 | ||
*Yoder, 1972 | *Yoder, 1972 |
Revision as of 16:35, 5 February 2009
It has been suggested that this article be merged with Strict scrutiny and Talk:Compelling state interest#Merger proposal. (Discuss) Proposed since October 2007. |
The compelling state interest test is a test used by the US Federal Courts in due process and equal protection claims (all claims with Constitutional bases, actually) under the Fourteenth Amendment for state action and under the Fifth Amendment for federal action. It is part of the strict scrutiny analysis that a federal court will employ when either a suspect class is involved or a fundamental right. A government action or statute subject to strict scrutiny must satisfy a compelling state interest that is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The court will give the strictest scrutiny of the state or federal action when it impacts or targets a specially protected class (race, ethnicity) or when a fundamental and Constitutionally protected right is involved (Freedom of Speech, Right to Vote). The compelling state interest test is distinguishable from the rational basis test, which involves Fourteenth and Fifth Amendment claims that do not involve a suspect class and involve a liberty interest rather than a fundamental right.
Notable cases
can anyone just put garbage of this site
- Sherbert, 1963
- Yoder, 1972
- Smith, 1990
- City of Boerne, 1997
- O Centro v Gonzalez, 2006
See also
- Rational Basis Test
- Intermediate scrutiny
- Strict scrutiny
- Fundamental right
- Suspect class
- Constitutional Law
This legal term article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |