| Revision as of 05:56, 7 February 2009 editFastily (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled100,543 editsm Reverted edits by 68.2.243.179 (talk) to last version by Fastily← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:56, 7 February 2009 edit undoInternet Scholar (talk | contribs)2,971 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| I was testing different things having to do with personal sandboxes and I noticed that when making a change while logged out it was reverted by your account. I was just wondering if that was a bot action or a user action that does that? please respond on my user talk page ] | I was testing different things having to do with personal sandboxes and I noticed that when making a change while logged out it was reverted by your account. I was just wondering if that was a bot action or a user action that does that? please respond on my user talk page ] | ||
| == Saini == | |||
| Would you be kind enough to let me know why you reverted my edits on Saini article without leaving any notes or reasoning on Discussion page? Please share your thoughts with me. Meanwhile, I am going to restore my edits. Please leave a note on Discussion page and give me adequate time to respond before reverting it again (only if need be) . I am assuming good faith. Thanks.--] (]) 05:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:56, 7 February 2009
-User:Fastily
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
question about revert of sandbox change
I was testing different things having to do with personal sandboxes and I noticed that when making a change while logged out it was reverted by your account. I was just wondering if that was a bot action or a user action that does that? please respond on my user talk page zephalis
Saini
Would you be kind enough to let me know why you reverted my edits on Saini article without leaving any notes or reasoning on Discussion page? Please share your thoughts with me. Meanwhile, I am going to restore my edits. Please leave a note on Discussion page and give me adequate time to respond before reverting it again (only if need be) . I am assuming good faith. Thanks.--Internet Scholar (talk) 05:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)