Revision as of 00:17, 9 February 2009 editImbris (talk | contribs)3,915 edits →Maltese (dog): new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:00, 9 February 2009 edit undoPietru (talk | contribs)3,694 edits →Maltese (dog)Next edit → | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
] (]) 00:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ] (]) 00:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:The fact user Tool2Die4 has been blocked (indefinitely) for destructive editing, and you Imbris have begun your nationalistically motivated edits once again (one has only to check your talk page/user history for ample examples), render most of what you've written utterly laughable. You seem to think there's a Wiki conspiracy keeping your unblemished edits from seeing the light of day: reality check. This article (woof woof) demonstrated no such nationalistic blemishes till you arrived on the scene. Reverting the article to its pristine state might be better than preserving such fallacious contributions after all. ] (]) 14:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:00, 9 February 2009
Feel free to comment on my edits here.
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, Elm-39, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Also, please note that while constructive dialogue and opposing viewpoints are always welcome, Misplaced Pages policy does not condone personal attacks or insults. Please reconsider the message on my talk page and perhaps consider a more constructive message. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your positive contributions! Thank you, Unimaginative Username (talk) 10:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying the humorous nature of your comment. It occurred to me afterward that it might have been meant in jest, and I appreciate you confirming that. In that light, it was actually quite funny! So, again, welcome! Unimaginative Username (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (December 2008)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 22:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Berman
Did you read Shamrox's version of the article? For the most part the sources were not themselves the problem, but that his edits were highly POV and effectively turned the article into a hit piece in pretty clear violation of WP:BLP. I'm going to revert it back for now and leave a note on his page explaining this better. Thanks. Ten Thousand Bullets (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree his estrangement from his son is encyclopedic, although one of his links regarding that was a primary source, to a message board. His edits to the lead section consisted of citing multiple critics' nicknames for him. Maybe some of that belongs, but not the way it was written. Looked to me like vandalism, so I went the revert route. But I've just left a message on his talk page to start a dialogue about it. Ten Thousand Bullets (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to HP (disambiguation), it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Huh? Are you even aware of what WP:CONSENSUS is? It was decided that we would stick to the letter of MOS:DAB#Linking to a primary topic, regardless of the primary topics being redirects. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Correction: WP:CONSENSUS is an official policy on Misplaced Pages. However, it can change. You just have to initiate a new thread on Talk:HP (disambiguation) and see if the majority will agree with your proposal. I'm only making a "big deal" about it because of the agreements at horsepower and Primary topics. Nothing more, nothing less. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's fine. ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Correction: WP:CONSENSUS is an official policy on Misplaced Pages. However, it can change. You just have to initiate a new thread on Talk:HP (disambiguation) and see if the majority will agree with your proposal. I'm only making a "big deal" about it because of the agreements at horsepower and Primary topics. Nothing more, nothing less. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: FIRExNECK
I am sorry, I don't know how you got dragged into this. Considering the scope of the edits made by FIRExNECK I considered my response to be very civil. Calling a rival club "Douchebags" and insinuating that the fans have ties to racist organizations (without substantiation), does not in any way sound like good faith edits. I did not report FIRExNECK, I undid the edits and I posted to his talk page asking that he use his time making constructive edits. I don't know how this could have been construed as uncivil. I do not plan on making any more of an issue over this, but I think it is the communities responsibility to protect itself from people who continue to deface others work, and that is what I did. Starfury56 (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Rrs-studio
I speak Spanish, using Google language tools gives"RRS-study Research Group Architectural and design. Founded in 2006 by Riccardo Renzi is formed by Michael Mosconi, Stefania Bracci, Niccolo 'CURRIN, Sara Braschi in addition to the collaborations that have seen over time join the group even Margherita Caldi Inchingolo, Georgina Monica Lalli, Eva Maria De Marco and to Today, Cinzia Cossu and Federica Decurtis. The group concentrates its research in urban and man-made environment." I saw no notability in the article. ttonyb1 (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (January 2009)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Biting newcomers
I hope you're taking the comments on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/330th Bombardment Group about WP:Bite to heart. It seems you forgot your own note to self:
"Don't delete articles unless they're pure vandalism. Don't even think about it! Someone *will* attempt to prove wrong any point you try to make, and they can be right about it."
It would be ok if you constructively engaged this editor if you didn't want to apologize to him. Toddst1 (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Maltese (dog)
You can go over every single change at the history section of the article. One of those changes would be *http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Maltese_(dog)&diff=prev&oldid=267991313
There you can find out much on the content dispute.
It was narrowed up to these points:
- Whether or not to mention the fact that Mljet is in today's Croatia
- Whether or not to mention one of the Croatian names for the dog (French name included in the infobox)
- Whether or not to mention the fact established by La Fédération Cynologique Internationale which says: "His name does not signify that he originates from the island of Malta" as the first sentence of the dog's standard.
- Whether or not to include Bochart, in his "Hierozoicon," also quotes Callimachus to be correct.
- Whether or not to include this sentence "During the first century, Publius, the Roman governor of Malta, had a Maltese named Issa of which he was very fond." just after the completely POV sentence "Maltese are generally associated with the island of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea" thus injustly strengthening the claim of the POV sentence.
- Whether or not to include in the history section the entire Publius/Martial poetry, or perhaps in the trivia section.
I belive that it would be biased to mention Italy, Spain, Lyons, Malta and some other countries which have less to do with the dog and not to mention Mljet in the context of Dalmatia and Croatia.
Pietru il-Boqli is full of accusations and disruptive, he offended Tool2Die4. Pietru il-Boqli started his negative approach by name calling, like East European, Croatian, Yugoslav, Italian. He is the only one who sees my editing as problematic.
I cannot stress enought that Pietru il-Boqli deleted sourced information with his POV editing and that the diff shows only his intervention.
Also I would like to mention that Tool2Die4 (also edited the article) stopped reverting my editing when I provided explanation of my editing on his talk page. Then Pietru il-Boqli offended him.
And finally, before I started editing the Maltese (dog) article it was completely Malta biased version which Pietru il-Boqli and some other editors (Tool2Die4 including) maintained.
Imbris (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- The fact user Tool2Die4 has been blocked (indefinitely) for destructive editing, and you Imbris have begun your nationalistically motivated edits once again (one has only to check your talk page/user history for ample examples), render most of what you've written utterly laughable. You seem to think there's a Wiki conspiracy keeping your unblemished edits from seeing the light of day: reality check. This article (woof woof) demonstrated no such nationalistic blemishes till you arrived on the scene. Reverting the article to its pristine state might be better than preserving such fallacious contributions after all. את אמא כל כך שמנה, היא יושבת ליד כולם (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)