Talk:Lord Evelyn Stuart: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:06, 10 February 2009 editRegentsPark (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,689 edits →Move?: oppose← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:08, 10 February 2009 edit undoRegentsPark (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,689 edits Reformatting and adding move tag.Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{move\|Lord Evelyn Stuart}}
	{{WPBiography		{{WPBiography
	\|living=no		\|living=no
Line 8:		Line 9:
	]		]

	== ~~Move?~~ ==		==Requested move==

	* '''] → {{noredirect\|Lord Evelyn Stuart}}''' — Commonly known as Lord Evelyn Stuart. This was also the former name of the article — {{#ifeq:{{{sig}}}\|no\|\|] (]) 17:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)}}		* '''] → {{noredirect\|Lord Evelyn Stuart}}''' — Commonly known as Lord Evelyn Stuart. This was also the former name of the article — {{#ifeq:{{{sig}}}\|no\|\|] (]) 17:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 23:08, 10 February 2009

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Evelyn Stuart → Lord Evelyn Stuart — Commonly known as Lord Evelyn Stuart. This was also the former name of the article — Tryde (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the reverse of a move that User:Roman Spinner made with edit comment "Misplaced Pages main title headers do not utilize salutations, honorifics as well as titles of nobility, academe or military". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per WP:NAME. The title, followed by the use of the honorific in the opening line, seems appropriate now. --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)