Revision as of 18:18, 29 October 2005 editEvilphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,023 editsm →Re: Supreme Commander: response to anon← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:58, 1 November 2005 edit undoPatCheng (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,062 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Hermione Granger, of course. :-) ]]]''']''' 12:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | Hermione Granger, of course. :-) ]]]''']''' 12:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
==Vandalism by TJive== | |||
Hello, ] has repeatedly deleting off sections of articles he don't agree with without consensus. . Several months ago he has been warned by Rama, and he's back doing it again |
Revision as of 05:58, 1 November 2005
Archive 01: May 2005 - August 2005
Archive 02: May 2005 - October 2005
Archive 03: October 2005 (much busier as an admin, I guess)
Archive 04: In progress
Status
WP:RFA/SV
Thanks for your interest in WP:RFA/SV. I have responded to your latest comment/change of vote there. Regards, St|eve 00:41, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
India
Heh. And I was just about to delete the thugi article just because it sucked and was orphaned. And that was a pretty crazy catch of my redirect typo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.68.224.129 (talk • contribs) 04:15, October 29, 2005 (UTC)
- You can't actually delete an article, only Administrators can do that. If you remove all the text of an article, we still have the article, and will actually generally revert back from such page blankings. If you think an article should be deleted you're more than welcome to submit it to Articles for Deletion. And as far as the catch goes, well, we watch closely. Why not go ahead and sign up for a user account? Best regards, Ëvilphoenix 04:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Re: {{anon}}
Hehe! Success! The anon's message on your talk page is what prompted me to do it. I saw it on my watchlist. :o Acetic' 04:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Re: Supreme Commander
I didn't know why you reverted my edits, since the talk page complained about the page having trouble with people finding the article. Also the disambiguation was useless since nothing on military ranks or commander-in-chief links there. I was only trying to help and you treated me like if I was a vandal.
- Please use edit summaries in your edits. If you don't say that you are doing something per discussion, I have no reason to believe that you are. Ëvilphoenix 05:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
So am I allowed to edit the page again if I use use the summaries?
- Could you do me a favor and link me to the discussion first, and let me look at it? Ëvilphoenix 05:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Here it is: Talk:Supreme Commander (game)
- No, the discussion above it reached a consensus to make Supreme Commander a disambiguation page, which is perfectly acceptable and well within standard Misplaced Pages practice. Please don't adjust the re-directs or move the pages around. Thanks. Ëvilphoenix 18:18, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Re: costume
Hermione Granger, of course. :-) Hermione1980 12:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism by TJive
Hello, TJive has repeatedly deleting off sections of articles he don't agree with without consensus. . Several months ago he has been warned by Rama, and he's back doing it again