| Revision as of 20:32, 21 February 2009 edit71.96.27.217 (talk) Undid revision 272333588 by Fastily (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:34, 21 February 2009 edit undo71.96.27.217 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ==Your warning on my talk page== | ==Your warning on my talk page== | ||
| I did not delete content without reason. The information didn't include a valid citation, so it shouldn't have been included. Please don't leave spurious warnings on my talk page. ] (]) | I did not delete content without reason. The information didn't include a valid citation, so it shouldn't have been included. Please don't leave spurious warnings on my talk page. ] (]) | ||
| :Removing uncited information from the encyclopedia isn't vandalism. It's good faith editing. It's not incumbent upon me to source information that's added to the article; it's incumbent upon the user wanting to include the information. I don't appreciate of being accused of vandalism or of your inappropriate reversions of my edits. ] (]) 20:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:34, 21 February 2009
-User:Fastily
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
Edits to Seven Pounds
Though it may seem my edit was vandalism, I was in the process of posting an interpretation into some of the film's themes as original material for wikipedia. If there is to be a better method of doing this, I am somewhat a novice to Misplaced Pages, and I would appreciate the chance to follow proper procedure.--64.114.135.25 (talk) 06:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is not the place to publish original research (OR). It needs to be sourced from WP:V and WP:RS. -- Fyslee (talk) 07:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Your warning on my talk page
I did not delete content without reason. The information didn't include a valid citation, so it shouldn't have been included. Please don't leave spurious warnings on my talk page. 71.96.27.217 (talk)
- Removing uncited information from the encyclopedia isn't vandalism. It's good faith editing. It's not incumbent upon me to source information that's added to the article; it's incumbent upon the user wanting to include the information. I don't appreciate of being accused of vandalism or of your inappropriate reversions of my edits. 71.96.27.217 (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)