| Revision as of 09:48, 24 February 2009 editG Purevdorj (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,397 edits →Mongolia during Tang rule← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:52, 24 February 2009 edit undoGenuineMongol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users510 edits →Mongolia during Tang ruleNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Delete''' The content reflects traditional Chinese history conceptions, not a picture of history as could be reached by using sources not intended for tradition. I don't see any way to mend it as the topic is inherently biased and, as Yaan pointed out, you cannot really speak of an effective Chinese rule. Why not write an article about pre-Heian Japan under Chinese rule? Nominally, they were in some sense, but no one would think of writing such nonsense. This article is pure Chinese chauvinism and deserves to be deleted. ] (]) 09:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' The content reflects traditional Chinese history conceptions, not a picture of history as could be reached by using sources not intended for tradition. I don't see any way to mend it as the topic is inherently biased and, as Yaan pointed out, you cannot really speak of an effective Chinese rule. Why not write an article about pre-Heian Japan under Chinese rule? Nominally, they were in some sense, but no one would think of writing such nonsense. This article is pure Chinese chauvinism and deserves to be deleted. ] (]) 09:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' 1. Mongolia did not exist when the Tang dynasty shortly invaded the Turkic khanates, so Mongolia could not be subject to the Tang rule. 2. Article ] has mentioned the short invasion. So, there is no need and basis for creating this article. It must be deleted. ] (]) 12:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:52, 24 February 2009
Mongolia during Tang rule
- Mongolia during Tang rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Content fork.
No real sources unless you count primary ones, or "Smith, p. 4711" or "Cambridge History of China, vol. 11" without page number. Some rather strange claims (like Chinese conquered the Russian steppe), a somewhat unclear reference to the Khitan people who were far from dominating in the area at the time - and whose exact ethnic affiliations are not really as clear as that strange reference seems to imply - and a lot of stuff that has no obvious relation to Mongolia at all. Most of the content for this article has been removed from Han Chinese a while ago (like here by myself or here by someone else). Valid content - for several decades in the 7th century, the Göktürks were subjects of the Tang dynasty - is treated much better in Tang Dynasty#Turkish and Western regions, Protectorate General to Pacify the North, History of Mongolia#Turkic_Period and Göktürks. Yaan (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Turn into redirect to History of Mongolia#Turkic_Period. This seems more appropriate than the others, even if just because of the word "Mongolia" being contained in the article title. Yaan (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 01:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Keep This is an important subject, and the article should be improved apon. -download | sign! 00:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep and improve. Important topic in the history of a country. Capitalistroadster (talk) 05:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The content reflects traditional Chinese history conceptions, not a picture of history as could be reached by using sources not intended for tradition. I don't see any way to mend it as the topic is inherently biased and, as Yaan pointed out, you cannot really speak of an effective Chinese rule. Why not write an article about pre-Heian Japan under Chinese rule? Nominally, they were in some sense, but no one would think of writing such nonsense. This article is pure Chinese chauvinism and deserves to be deleted. G Purevdorj (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete 1. Mongolia did not exist when the Tang dynasty shortly invaded the Turkic khanates, so Mongolia could not be subject to the Tang rule. 2. Article Göktürks has mentioned the short invasion. So, there is no need and basis for creating this article. It must be deleted. GenuineMongol (talk) 12:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)