Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lexein/AbleNET: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Lexein Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:52, 25 February 2009 editSantavez (talk | contribs)83 edits →Re-Initiation: question on citations← Previous edit Revision as of 05:00, 25 February 2009 edit undoTothwolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,326 edits →Re-InitiationNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
] (]) 01:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC) ] (]) 01:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
:You may want to convert the references to use the {{tl|cite web}} template with at least the url, title, and accessdate options. I considered converting them myself but there were too many for me to convert quickly and I've currently got my hands full with the IRC category cleanup. This wasn't the only article that was targeted but I've been trying to focus on sorting and cleaning up what's left before taking others to DRV, etc. ] (]) 02:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC) :You may want to convert the references to use the {{tl|cite web}} template with at least the url, title, and accessdate options. I considered converting them myself but there were too many for me to convert quickly and I've currently got my hands full with the IRC category cleanup. This wasn't the only article that was targeted but I've been trying to focus on sorting and cleaning up what's left before taking others to DRV, etc. ] (]) 02:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
::Should I still use the &#60;ref&#62; tag to keep the reference as part of the subtext? I apologize for the question, but I am not familiar with the template. I understand the concept, just looking to understand proper utilization. If you can cite an article as a point of reference, that would make it clear for me. ::Should I still use the &#60;ref&#62; tag to keep the reference as part of the subtext? I apologize for the question, but I am not familiar with the template. I understand the concept, just looking to understand proper utilization. If you can cite an article as a point of reference, that would make it clear for me.<br>Thank you!<br>] (]) 03:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
:::Correct, the {{tl|cite web}} template should go inside &#60;ref&#62; tags. ] (]) 05:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
] (]) 03:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:00, 25 February 2009

This is a subpage of Lexein's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Re-Initiation

Suggestions needed and welcome on clarifying content. Santavez (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

You may want to convert the references to use the {{cite web}} template with at least the url, title, and accessdate options. I considered converting them myself but there were too many for me to convert quickly and I've currently got my hands full with the IRC category cleanup. This wasn't the only article that was targeted but I've been trying to focus on sorting and cleaning up what's left before taking others to DRV, etc. Tothwolf (talk) 02:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Should I still use the <ref> tag to keep the reference as part of the subtext? I apologize for the question, but I am not familiar with the template. I understand the concept, just looking to understand proper utilization. If you can cite an article as a point of reference, that would make it clear for me.
Thank you!
Santavez (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Correct, the {{cite web}} template should go inside <ref> tags. Tothwolf (talk) 05:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)