| Revision as of 17:22, 26 February 2009 editVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →Other/Previous accounts: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:40, 26 February 2009 edit undoKarloff (talk | contribs)75 edits →Other/Previous accountsNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Hi. Do you or have you operated other accounts on wikipedia that have edited the same topics or articles as you are now? Such accounts should be declared per ]. Thanks, ] <small>]</small> 17:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | Hi. Do you or have you operated other accounts on wikipedia that have edited the same topics or articles as you are now? Such accounts should be declared per ]. Thanks, ] <small>]</small> 17:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Nope, and do you have some economic interest in Aspartame? Your interest should not need to be declared per Misplaced Pages policy, but for respect to a objective discussion. (] (]) 23:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)) | |||
Revision as of 23:40, 26 February 2009
February 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Aspartame controversy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. OrangeMarlin 02:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Other/Previous accounts
Hi. Do you or have you operated other accounts on wikipedia that have edited the same topics or articles as you are now? Such accounts should be declared per wikipedia policy. Thanks, Verbal chat 17:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Nope, and do you have some economic interest in Aspartame? Your interest should not need to be declared per Misplaced Pages policy, but for respect to a objective discussion. (Karloff (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC))